You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Brian Eaton <be...@google.com> on 2008/03/18 17:10:43 UTC

signing embed requests

I'm considering modifying ProxyHandler.java so that it no longer even
thinks about trying to sign requests being tunneled through the image
embedding proxy.  Signing would be available only through the JSON
proxy.

Note that no existing code (that I can find, anyway) would trigger the
signing functionality for the embedding proxy.  No gadget security
token is provided, much less the appropriate parameters to enable
signing.

Objections?

Re: signing embed requests

Posted by Kevin Brown <et...@google.com>.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Brian Eaton <be...@google.com> wrote:

> I'm considering modifying ProxyHandler.java so that it no longer even
> thinks about trying to sign requests being tunneled through the image
> embedding proxy.  Signing would be available only through the JSON
> proxy.


I thought this was the case already, but it might have become possible after
the initial check in. The "open" proxy shouldn't be aware of any
authentication or signing. Explicitly disallowing it would probably be good.


>
> Note that no existing code (that I can find, anyway) would trigger the
> signing functionality for the embedding proxy.  No gadget security
> token is provided, much less the appropriate parameters to enable
> signing.
>
> Objections?
>



-- 
~Kevin