You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Malcolm Rowe <ma...@farside.org.uk> on 2007/01/04 22:55:32 UTC
Re: svn commit: r22801 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_client
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:48:07PM -0800, dlr@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: dlr
> Date: Sun Dec 24 13:48:07 2006
> New Revision: 22801
>
> Log:
> Fix usage of the array of path-specific info fed to the path driver
> callback for copy/move operations. apr_array_header_t's should store
> pointers, rather than values.
>
Incidentally, is there any particular reason that we should store
pointers in APR arrays rather than structures? (assuming we're only
pushing new items onto the end).
Regards,
Malcolm
Re: svn commit: r22801 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_client
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 1/4/07, Malcolm Rowe <ma...@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:48:07PM -0800, dlr@tigris.org wrote:
> > Author: dlr
> > Date: Sun Dec 24 13:48:07 2006
> > New Revision: 22801
> >
> > Log:
> > Fix usage of the array of path-specific info fed to the path driver
> > callback for copy/move operations. apr_array_header_t's should store
> > pointers, rather than values.
> >
>
> Incidentally, is there any particular reason that we should store
> pointers in APR arrays rather than structures? (assuming we're only
> pushing new items onto the end).
No particularly good reason. There are examples in the httpd codebase
that store structures in apr arrays, it works just fine.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org