You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Hans Reip <sp...@googlemail.com> on 2007/03/13 08:02:25 UTC

Usage of jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar instead of the myfaces jars

Hi,

I have already posted this question but I unfortunately chose the wrong
section (by mistake).

I am a newbie in JSF and I tried to install the myFaces JSF implementation
and after a couple of hours I finally succeeded.

Now I have a question:
I am using the tomahawk jar in combination with the jsf-api.jar and
jsf-impl.jar. Instead of the Sun jars I could also use the 
myfaces-api-1.1.5.jar and the myfaces-impl-1.1.5.jar.

What is the difference when using the Sun jars instead the myFaces jars.
What whould you recommend?

Thanks in advance.
Regards
Hans
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Usage-of-jsf-api.jar-and-jsf-impl.jar-instead-of-the-myfaces-jars-tf3394258.html#a9449351
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


RE: Usage of jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar instead of the myfaces jars

Posted by Hans Reip <sp...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Roger,

thanks a lot. That are good arguments for using the myFaces implementation.

Regards
Hans

Roger Alix-Gaudreau wrote:
> 
> I would recommend using the MyFaces reference implementation instead of
> Sun's.  MyFaces implements the full spec and provides some useful
> additional functionality.
> 
> In my own experience, using Sun's RI sometimes causes issues that don't
> occur with MyFaces.  One example is duplicate component id's on the
> rendered page -- it's a problem I've seen over and over again with Sun's
> RI, but not with MyFaces.
> 
> Roger Alix-Gaudreau
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Usage-of-jsf-api.jar-and-jsf-impl.jar-instead-of-the-myfaces-jars-tf3394258.html#a9451798
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


RE: Usage of jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar instead of the myfaces jars

Posted by Roger Alix-Gaudreau <Rg...@manh.com>.
I would recommend using the MyFaces reference implementation instead of
Sun's.  MyFaces implements the full spec and provides some useful
additional functionality.

In my own experience, using Sun's RI sometimes causes issues that don't
occur with MyFaces.  One example is duplicate component id's on the
rendered page -- it's a problem I've seen over and over again with Sun's
RI, but not with MyFaces.

Roger Alix-Gaudreau

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Reip [mailto:spampolizei@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:32 PM
To: users@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: Usage of jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar instead of the myfaces
jars


Hi,

I have already posted this question but I unfortunately chose the wrong
section (by mistake).

I am a newbie in JSF and I tried to install the myFaces JSF
implementation
and after a couple of hours I finally succeeded.

Now I have a question:
I am using the tomahawk jar in combination with the jsf-api.jar and
jsf-impl.jar. Instead of the Sun jars I could also use the 
myfaces-api-1.1.5.jar and the myfaces-impl-1.1.5.jar.

What is the difference when using the Sun jars instead the myFaces jars.
What whould you recommend?

Thanks in advance.
Regards
Hans
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Usage-of-jsf-api.jar-and-jsf-impl.jar-instead-of-t
he-myfaces-jars-tf3394258.html#a9449351
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.