You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/10/04 09:17:50 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31522] New: - [patch] Gamma.logGamma performance

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31522>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31522

[patch] Gamma.logGamma performance

           Summary: [patch] Gamma.logGamma performance
           Product: Commons
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Math
        AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: kgeis@speakeasy.net


I did some profiling on a project and found a lot of time spent in
Gamma.logGamma() (I'm doing a lot of t-tests.)  I found some tweaks to the code
that give me a 65% performance increase.  I'm using JDK 1.5.

Let's see if I can attach a patch here...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org