You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> on 2009/10/05 19:41:48 UTC
Re: svn commit: r39780 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, 5 Oct 2009 at 06:45 -0700:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Mon Oct 5 06:45:56 2009
> New Revision: 39780
>
> Log:
> Write "the 'current' file" instead of "the current file" for clarity in error
> messages and comments when referring to the FSFS file otherwise known as the
> txn-current file and named 'db/current'.
The commit looks fine, but the log message implies that 'txn-current'
and 'current' are the same thing. And, as far as I can tell,
[[[
.../mirror/svn/db% cat current
39705
.../mirror/svn/db% cat txn-current
ut7
.../mirror/svn/db% grep current ../../../trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/structure | head -n 2
txn-current File containing the next transaction key
current File specifying current revision and next node/copy id
.../mirror/svn/db%
]]]
they aren't the same :)
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2403866
Re: svn commit: r39780 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs
Posted by Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com>.
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The commit looks fine, but the log message implies that 'txn-current'
> and 'current' are the same thing. And, as far as I can tell,
[...]
> they aren't the same :)
D'oh, thanks. I have edited the log message.
- Julian
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2403910