You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2009/12/09 19:33:11 UTC
[Bug 6252] New: Force publish VANITY
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
Summary: Force publish VANITY
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.3.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: wtogami@redhat.com
I want to add VANITY to rulesrc/10_force_active.cf with a score of 2.1. It has
a 0% FP rate in ruleqa. It doesn't appear to hit many spam because it targets
a specific type of rare spam that targets real people and generally not spam
traps.
I believe it is a simple rule that would be safe to enable. Furthermore I
actively maintain the rule based upon ruleqa results and reported spam.
jm wasn't sure if we need to vote for this. Anyway, votes?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6252] Force publish VANITY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
--- Comment #4 from Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 2009-12-10 04:02:39 UTC ---
btw iirc there is a "tflags publish" that you should add to the sandbox file
for this, too. not quite sure though so check docs first ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6252] Force publish VANITY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
--- Comment #2 from Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> 2009-12-09 14:57:16 UTC ---
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/T_VANITY/detail
It was auto-published earlier, but then fell out for reasons I don't know. I
suspect it is because this a very rare type of spam. Typically ONE is sent to
a targeted individual every few weeks. It seems to rely upon low quantity in
order to seem more legitimate.
I intend to continue to watch this rule's performance and updating it via
sa-update if necessary. I have high confidence in this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6252] Force publish VANITY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jm@jmason.org
--- Comment #1 from Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 2009-12-09 13:31:45 UTC ---
can you provide a ruleqa link that demos its quality? normally the automatic
promotion should do a good enough job.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6252] Force publish VANITY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> 2009-12-10 06:47:07 UTC ---
I think 10_force_publish.cf alone is sufficient. I'll watch the promotions
tomorrow to be sure.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6252] Force publish VANITY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
--- Comment #3 from Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 2009-12-10 04:02:10 UTC ---
ah, I see, very low hitrate. go for it, +1
we eventually need to figure out how to automate QA for
super-low-hitrate-but-accurate rules like this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6252] Force publish VANITY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6252
Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P5 |P2
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.