You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> on 2019/02/06 21:35:38 UTC
BouncyCastle version different from Maven and Ant builds
Hi,
while working on OWASP stuff I have found that Maven dependency of
BouncyCastle is newer than the one in the Ant configuration.
The same is on branch-3.5.
On branch-3.4 we have bouncycastle only on Maven (I am sending a patch
for this one)
see:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/af741cb319d4760cfab1cd3b560635adacd8deca/pom.xml#L279
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/af741cb319d4760cfab1cd3b560635adacd8deca/build.xml#L47
I wil be happy to send a patch, but we should decide for a roadmap
This makes me think we should step out of this dual-configuration as
soon as possible.
Enrico
Re: BouncyCastle version different from Maven and Ant builds
Posted by Andor Molnar <an...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Enrico, please try to get BouncyCastle versions is sync by upgrading the
Ant version. It's used only for testing, shouldn't do any harm.
I agree that dual build system cannot work on the long run. Once you guys
finished the Maven migration, we'll start decomissioning the Ant build.
Andor
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:34 AM Norbert Kalmar <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Wow, nice catch, thanks!
>
> As we just discussed having potentially dual builds for the foreseeable
> future, I agree, this is a huge source of errors. We have 3 active branch,
> so triple the chances of getting desync in versions. We could create a
> properties file for versions that both ant and maven reads. (Or if dropping
> ant gets voted, this problem is solved :) But I don't think that will
> happen on 3.4 and 3.5...)
>
> Regards,
> Norbert
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:35 PM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > while working on OWASP stuff I have found that Maven dependency of
> > BouncyCastle is newer than the one in the Ant configuration.
> > The same is on branch-3.5.
> > On branch-3.4 we have bouncycastle only on Maven (I am sending a patch
> > for this one)
> >
> > see:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/af741cb319d4760cfab1cd3b560635adacd8deca/pom.xml#L279
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/af741cb319d4760cfab1cd3b560635adacd8deca/build.xml#L47
> >
> > I wil be happy to send a patch, but we should decide for a roadmap
> >
> > This makes me think we should step out of this dual-configuration as
> > soon as possible.
> >
> > Enrico
> >
>
Re: BouncyCastle version different from Maven and Ant builds
Posted by Norbert Kalmar <nk...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Wow, nice catch, thanks!
As we just discussed having potentially dual builds for the foreseeable
future, I agree, this is a huge source of errors. We have 3 active branch,
so triple the chances of getting desync in versions. We could create a
properties file for versions that both ant and maven reads. (Or if dropping
ant gets voted, this problem is solved :) But I don't think that will
happen on 3.4 and 3.5...)
Regards,
Norbert
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:35 PM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> while working on OWASP stuff I have found that Maven dependency of
> BouncyCastle is newer than the one in the Ant configuration.
> The same is on branch-3.5.
> On branch-3.4 we have bouncycastle only on Maven (I am sending a patch
> for this one)
>
> see:
>
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/af741cb319d4760cfab1cd3b560635adacd8deca/pom.xml#L279
>
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/af741cb319d4760cfab1cd3b560635adacd8deca/build.xml#L47
>
> I wil be happy to send a patch, but we should decide for a roadmap
>
> This makes me think we should step out of this dual-configuration as
> soon as possible.
>
> Enrico
>