JNDIRealm maintenance

[John Holman <j....@qmul.ac.uk>]

Remy

I wrote the original JNDIRealm which Craig committed with modifications, 
made major enhancements in March this year and submitted documentation 
updates a couple of times since (which have still not been committed).

I'm prepared to maintain this component, but the difficulty of finding 
anyone with the time and interest to review and commit patches is a real 
problem, especially since Craig's involvement has reduced.  Commit 
access would help - but the recent discussion in Jakarta indicates that 
more is expected of a committer than maintaining a single component so 
maybe that is not appropriate. Any suggestions?

Regards, John.


bugzilla@apache.org wrote:

>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9705>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
>
>Extra LDAP searches occur during JNDIRealm authentication
>
>
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From remm@apache.org  2002-06-07 22:56 -------
>AFAIK, nobody is currently actively maintaining the JNDI realm. So the changes 
>you propose won't be implemented anytime soon unless you submit some patches.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>  
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: JNDIRealm maintenance

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

John Holman wrote:
> Remy
> 
> I wrote the original JNDIRealm which Craig committed with modifications, 
> made major enhancements in March this year and submitted documentation 
> updates a couple of times since (which have still not been committed).
> 
> I'm prepared to maintain this component, but the difficulty of finding 
> anyone with the time and interest to review and commit patches is a real 
> problem, especially since Craig's involvement has reduced.  Commit 
> access would help - but the recent discussion in Jakarta indicates that 
> more is expected of a committer than maintaining a single component so 
> maybe that is not appropriate. Any suggestions?
> 
> Regards, John.

Yes, I can understand that. Apparently, slighytly more is "needed" now 
to get commit access.
I can commit your patches until you get commit access. You can repost 
patches if they are not applied fast enough ;-)

Thanks,
Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>