You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com> on 2014/03/21 21:15:15 UTC

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Florin,

Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
updateNetworkServiceProvider
. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
and under what conditions?

Thanks,
Alena.


On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>scratch on a minimal setup.
>
>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.ht
>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>
>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>using the GUI fix up from
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>
>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>None in the GUI:
>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>
>And none in the database:
>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>
>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>networks.
>
>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>
>Any thoughts ?
>
>Best Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.