Re: [vote] archival of old, unsupported, tags

[Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> 
> If they have no level of support then why keep them around?

Support again..  Has there been someone requesting
support for M1-M4 and pointing to the tags?  We're not
on the user/consumer side of this deal, so unless
someone has asked, why do we think we know what they're
*going* to ask?

> They are litterally snapshots of what ever happened to be in the oven
> at the time.

Exactly.  That's what tags are for.  They're reference points.
When 1.0 has come and gone, and is no longer supported,
are you going to want to remove *that* tag too?
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQ2a6RZrNPMCpn3XdAQKl8AQA2LddpFy5Aj9I9lcA5XP6uZzNh9nuK3rp
8MQetIJWj+XmByt9xbQO026rZJ/dh4+0aY75hEGTyylqT/tAFj2iH2uO1AI3FNA2
9aORKXkigPZ32eSlKOY+D2umZfqiXjCmFUwUT4QRFUKo79+pzOK6EgU/OyFTxPMt
9xt8wr41cBQ=
=t3co
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----