You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@logging.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2016/05/19 14:58:40 UTC
[2/2] logging-log4j2 git commit: LOG4J2-1179 update top page with
results of performance investigation
LOG4J2-1179 update top page with results of performance investigation
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/commit/c73f49b3
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/tree/c73f49b3
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/diff/c73f49b3
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: c73f49b312d129a51e05a7bc90d7f5a4684b8433
Parents: 857f06f
Author: rpopma <rp...@apache.org>
Authored: Thu May 19 23:59:14 2016 +0900
Committer: rpopma <rp...@apache.org>
Committed: Thu May 19 23:59:14 2016 +0900
----------------------------------------------------------------------
src/site/xdoc/index.xml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/blob/c73f49b3/src/site/xdoc/index.xml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/src/site/xdoc/index.xml b/src/site/xdoc/index.xml
index 50912cc..eb1ab7f 100644
--- a/src/site/xdoc/index.xml
+++ b/src/site/xdoc/index.xml
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
orders of magnitude lower latency than Log4j 1.x and Logback.
See <a href="manual/async.html#Performance">Asynchronous Logging Performance</a>
for details.
- Otherwise, Log4j 2 performs faster than Log4j 1.x in critical areas
- and similarly to Logback under most circumstances.
+ Otherwise, Log4j 2 significantly outperforms Log4j 1.x, Logback and java.util.logging,
+ especially in multi-threaded applications.
See <a href="performance.html">Performance</a> for more information.
</dd>
<dt>Support for multiple APIs</dt>