You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2002/09/20 19:19:35 UTC
Releasing 2.0.42
Hi,
Done enough testing to say:
+1 for GA
Sander
RE: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Kean Johnston [mailto:jkj@caldera.com]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 03:29
> Just as a matter of interest, which version or what date did the
> APR/APU snapshot come from? I recently made some changes to APR
> for SCO OpenServer that'd be great if they went out with 2.0.42.
Your changes were committed after the T&R of 2.0.42. Expect them
to be in the next release.
Sander
RE: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by Kean Johnston <jk...@caldera.com>.
Just as a matter of interest, which version or what date did the
APR/APU snapshot come from? I recently made some changes to APR
for SCO OpenServer that'd be great if they went out with 2.0.42.
Kean.
> I'm now confident that 2.0.42 is stable.
Re: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by gr...@apache.org.
gregames@apache.org wrote:
>
> Sander Striker wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Done enough testing to say:
> >
> > +1 for GA
>
> I reserve my judgement until it has run longer without problems on daedalus.
I'm now confident that 2.0.42 is stable.
Greg
Re: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by gr...@apache.org.
Sander Striker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Done enough testing to say:
>
> +1 for GA
Having been burned before, I reserve my judgement until it has run longer
without problems on daedalus. It's been up less than 22 hours so far; I'll be
satisfied if we make it to 48 hours when at least 24 of those are non-weekend
time.
(not that I think anything is wrong with it...just being Joe Cautious)
Greg
Re: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@covalent.net>.
> Hi,
>
> Done enough testing to say:
>
> +1 for GA
I'm seeing good behaviour on MacOSX 10.2.1. The server fails a bunch of
access tests:
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
modules/access. 408 31 7.60% 4, 20-21, 24, 26, 28, 30, 38, 55,
72, 89, 106-107, 123-124, 141,
154, 168, 170, 175, 192, 209,
226, 277, 290, 304, 306, 311,
328, 345, 362
10 tests and 6 subtests skipped.
These are tests for 'Deny/Allow from localhost': apparently on Jaguar
'127.0.0.1' doesn't resolve into 'localhost' anymore. I haven't gotten to
the bottom of this yet.
Other tests are OK. This compile was with:
sctemme@shadow:~/projects/httpd-test/perl-framework $ cat
../../httpd-2.0.42-tag/config.nice
#! /bin/sh
#
# Created by configure
CFLAGS="-DDEBUG -O0"; export CFLAGS
"./configure" \
"--prefix=/tmp/apache2042" \
"--enable-module=most" \
"--with-port=8080" \
"--enable-maintainer-mode" \
"--enable-so" \
"--with-layout=Apache" \
"--enable-info=shared" \
"--enable-ssl=shared" \
"--enable-deflate=shared" \
"--enable-expires=shared" \
"--enable-headers=shared" \
"$@"
Have a good weekend,
S.
--
Covalent Technologies sctemme@covalent.net
Engineering group Voice: (415) 856 4214
303 Second Street #375 South Fax: (415) 856 4210
San Francisco CA 94107
PGP Fingerprint: 1E74 4E58 DFAC 2CF5 6A03 5531 AFB1 96AF B584 0AB1
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message
=======================================================
RE: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:13, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Compiles and serves pages on Windows. Can someone more familier with the
> httpd test suite do a regression run?
It passes the httpd-test regression suite on Linux. +1 for GA
Brian
RE: Releasing 2.0.42
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Compiles and serves pages on Windows. Can someone more familier with the
httpd test suite do a regression run?
Bill
>
> Hi,
>
> Done enough testing to say:
>
> +1 for GA
>
> Sander
>