You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> on 2007/04/10 15:23:06 UTC
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
All,
Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress, and
making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
Thanks & Regards,
Marnie
On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Marnie,
>
> Hey np, I will take care of it.
>
> take it easy,
>
> Rajith
>
> On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rajith,
> >
> > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included technologies) -
> > thanks.
> >
> > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out as I'm
> > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so working to a
> > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding off
> into
> > the sunset :-)
> >
> > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little less
> > available !
> >
> > Bfn,
> > Marnie
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Marnie,
> > >
> > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in the
> next
> > > hour.
> > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little
> > > concerned
> > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than the
> code
> > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Marnie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Marnie,
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or 0's
> > all
> > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be
> > > included.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Carl.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is
> > fairly
> > > > well
> > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this in
> > status
> > > > and
> > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully
> from
> > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on an
> M2
> > > > which
> > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll email
> > > > > > separately
> > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Alan,
I was specifically responding to the release process question, not to
contributing to Qpid in general !
In reality, having someone doing release tasks without ability to actually
do anything themselves (and perhaps lacking any real project background)
doesn't make much sense imho for M2.
If Navin would like to get involved in Qpid per se, then I'm all in favour
of that and would be delighted for him to contribute.
Regards,
Marnie
On 4/12/07, Alan Conway <ac...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 13:48 +0100, Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > Hi Navin,
> >
> > Afaik you would need committer rights to be able to contribute anything
> much
> > to the M2 release I'm afraid.
> >
>
> We've had people make significant contributions without committer rights
> by sending patches to the list or attaching them to JIRAs.
>
> > On 4/11/07, Kamath, Navin <na...@iona.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rajith,
> > >
> > > IONA would like to help out in the M2 release process. But it will
> > > probably be Tej (already a committer) or myself (not yet a committer
> :)
> > > who will be doing it.
>
> Navin making patches and Tej applying them might be a good working
> arrangement.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan.
>
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Alan Conway <ac...@redhat.com>.
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 13:48 +0100, Marnie McCormack wrote:
> Hi Navin,
>
> Afaik you would need committer rights to be able to contribute anything much
> to the M2 release I'm afraid.
>
We've had people make significant contributions without committer rights
by sending patches to the list or attaching them to JIRAs.
> On 4/11/07, Kamath, Navin <na...@iona.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rajith,
> >
> > IONA would like to help out in the M2 release process. But it will
> > probably be Tej (already a committer) or myself (not yet a committer :)
> > who will be doing it.
Navin making patches and Tej applying them might be a good working
arrangement.
Cheers,
Alan.
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Navin,
Afaik you would need committer rights to be able to contribute anything much
to the M2 release I'm afraid.
Regards,
Marnie
On 4/11/07, Kamath, Navin <na...@iona.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rajith,
>
> IONA would like to help out in the M2 release process. But it will
> probably be Tej (already a committer) or myself (not yet a committer :)
> who will be doing it.
>
> Is there a JIRA task for this issue so that I can know what is being
> exactly for here?
>
> Regards,
> Navin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajith77@gmail.com]
> Sent: 11 April 2007 14:01
> To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
>
> Thanks Martin and Rupert for the comments.
> Steve V is no longer with iona or the project, so somebody needs to step
> up
> here and help.
>
> Dan Kulp can you help sorting out the maven issues ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On 4/11/07, Rupert Smith <ru...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > That merge list is getting long again. I tried to merge some changes I
> > made
> > that are nearer the end of it, but got conflicts so just abandoned the
> > merge
> > for the moment. Its definitely better if the list can be worked
> through in
> > order from earlier to later changes...
> >
> > On 11/04/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > My understanding of the branching was that we created M2 so that the
> > > new AMQP features could be moved to trunk and the _relatively_
> stable
> > > 0.8 implementation could be wound up for release before we spend a
> > > good few months getting the next implementation ready.
> > >
> > > A good starting point would be with the set of of open bugs and
> > > categorising them as M2 or M3 or later.
> > >
> > > I shall certainly do that with what I have open.
> > >
> > > The work that was done before on the legal notices won't work as we
> no
> > > longer have that information in our repository. However one of the
> > > driving forces behind the move to maven IIRC was to make this sort
> of
> > > thing easier. Unfortunately I haven't heard from Steve V. in a while
> > > as he would be the man with the answer, but maven must have a plug
> in
> > > that can generate an Apache legal notice document based on the
> project
> > > dependencies.
> > >
> > > The java trunk vs M2 difference is that I'm working mainly on M2
> > > finishing off the various outstanding issues I have and
> > > "theoretically" merging them to trunk as I go. Unfortunately, I've
> not
> > > had time to do the merging which really needs done before trunk runs
> > > off with too many new changes that prevents the merge.
> > >
> > > On 10/04/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Martin,
> > > >
> > > > I can help as much as I can and I hope that some of the work that
> we
> > put
> > > in
> > > > to the last release want have to be repeated.
> > > > For example the legal notices, licenses etc.
> > > >
> > > > If there are any new dependencies that we have added please let us
> > know.
> > > I
> > > > will create a wiki page to track M2 progress.
> > > > I cut the M2 branch based on request by JPM. However I am (or the
> > > community)
> > > > is not sure what is happening where.
> > > >
> > > > What is going on in the java trunk vs the M2 branch ? are
> > > > changes/improvements in the M2 being merged back to trunk?
> > > > When is the plan for M2 release?
> > > >
> > > > So lets start there and capture the items that going in to this
> > > release.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rajith
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/10/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, Rajith,
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let
> you
> > know
> > > > > being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few
> RCs.
> > > > >
> > > > > The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good
> > > starting
> > > > > read:
> > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> > > > >
> > > > > In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to
> > much
> > > > > development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we
> need
> > to
> > > > > set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked
> what
> > > > > defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting
> and
> > > > > merging any resulting defects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks !
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did
> for
> > M1.
> > > I
> > > > > > suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can
> > create
> > > RCs
> > > > > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for
> user
> > > docs on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first
> > > release)
> > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bye for now,
> > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey Marnie,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2
> branch.
> > > > > > > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the
> RC's
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack
> <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of
> > > progress,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > making a reasonably robust project available to
> download/use.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > take it easy,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> > marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all
> included
> > > > > > > technologies)
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have
> to
> > opt
> > > out
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily
> pregnant so
> > > > > working
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done
> before
> > > riding
> > > > > off
> > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave,
> but a
> > > little
> > > > > > > less
> > > > > > > > > > available !
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the
> > > release in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > next
> > > > > > > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for
> this
> > > release
> > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> > > marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby
> but
> > a
> > > > > little
> > > > > > > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons
> > other
> > > > > than
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we
> have
> > no
> > > -1's
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > 0's
> > > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also
> so
> > it
> > > > > must be
> > > > > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2
> Release
> > > vote
> > > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they
> > look
> > > like
> > > > > > > this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that
> the
> > > > > python is
> > > > > > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit
> > > behind
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > status
> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional
> effort
> > > > > (hopefully
> > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate
> our
> > > > > efforts on
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > M2
> > > > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered
> broker
> > > code)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group
> > > consensus.
> > > > > I'll
> > > > > > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Ritchie
> > >
> >
>
RE: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by "Kamath, Navin" <na...@iona.com>.
Hi Rajith,
IONA would like to help out in the M2 release process. But it will
probably be Tej (already a committer) or myself (not yet a committer :)
who will be doing it.
Is there a JIRA task for this issue so that I can know what is being
exactly for here?
Regards,
Navin
-----Original Message-----
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajith77@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 April 2007 14:01
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Thanks Martin and Rupert for the comments.
Steve V is no longer with iona or the project, so somebody needs to step
up
here and help.
Dan Kulp can you help sorting out the maven issues ?
Regards,
Rajith
On 4/11/07, Rupert Smith <ru...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> That merge list is getting long again. I tried to merge some changes I
> made
> that are nearer the end of it, but got conflicts so just abandoned the
> merge
> for the moment. Its definitely better if the list can be worked
through in
> order from earlier to later changes...
>
> On 11/04/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > My understanding of the branching was that we created M2 so that the
> > new AMQP features could be moved to trunk and the _relatively_
stable
> > 0.8 implementation could be wound up for release before we spend a
> > good few months getting the next implementation ready.
> >
> > A good starting point would be with the set of of open bugs and
> > categorising them as M2 or M3 or later.
> >
> > I shall certainly do that with what I have open.
> >
> > The work that was done before on the legal notices won't work as we
no
> > longer have that information in our repository. However one of the
> > driving forces behind the move to maven IIRC was to make this sort
of
> > thing easier. Unfortunately I haven't heard from Steve V. in a while
> > as he would be the man with the answer, but maven must have a plug
in
> > that can generate an Apache legal notice document based on the
project
> > dependencies.
> >
> > The java trunk vs M2 difference is that I'm working mainly on M2
> > finishing off the various outstanding issues I have and
> > "theoretically" merging them to trunk as I go. Unfortunately, I've
not
> > had time to do the merging which really needs done before trunk runs
> > off with too many new changes that prevents the merge.
> >
> > On 10/04/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > I can help as much as I can and I hope that some of the work that
we
> put
> > in
> > > to the last release want have to be repeated.
> > > For example the legal notices, licenses etc.
> > >
> > > If there are any new dependencies that we have added please let us
> know.
> > I
> > > will create a wiki page to track M2 progress.
> > > I cut the M2 branch based on request by JPM. However I am (or the
> > community)
> > > is not sure what is happening where.
> > >
> > > What is going on in the java trunk vs the M2 branch ? are
> > > changes/improvements in the M2 being merged back to trunk?
> > > When is the plan for M2 release?
> > >
> > > So lets start there and capture the items that going in to this
> > release.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/10/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Rajith,
> > > >
> > > > Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let
you
> know
> > > > being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few
RCs.
> > > >
> > > > The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good
> > starting
> > > > read:
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> > > >
> > > > In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to
> much
> > > > development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we
need
> to
> > > > set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked
what
> > > > defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting
and
> > > > merging any resulting defects.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks !
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did
for
> M1.
> > I
> > > > > suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can
> create
> > RCs
> > > > ?
> > > > >
> > > > > We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for
user
> > docs on
> > > > the
> > > > > non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first
> > release)
> > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Bye for now,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Marnie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2
branch.
> > > > > > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the
RC's
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack
<ma...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of
> > progress,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > making a reasonably robust project available to
download/use.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > take it easy,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all
included
> > > > > > technologies)
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have
to
> opt
> > out
> > > > as
> > > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily
pregnant so
> > > > working
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done
before
> > riding
> > > > off
> > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave,
but a
> > little
> > > > > > less
> > > > > > > > > available !
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the
> > release in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > next
> > > > > > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for
this
> > release
> > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> > marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby
but
> a
> > > > little
> > > > > > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons
> other
> > > > than
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we
have
> no
> > -1's
> > > > or
> > > > > > > 0's
> > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also
so
> it
> > > > must be
> > > > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2
Release
> > vote
> > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they
> look
> > like
> > > > > > this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that
the
> > > > python is
> > > > > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit
> > behind
> > > > this
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > status
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional
effort
> > > > (hopefully
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate
our
> > > > efforts on
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > M2
> > > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered
broker
> > code)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group
> > consensus.
> > > > I'll
> > > > > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Ritchie
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Martin and Rupert for the comments.
Steve V is no longer with iona or the project, so somebody needs to step up
here and help.
Dan Kulp can you help sorting out the maven issues ?
Regards,
Rajith
On 4/11/07, Rupert Smith <ru...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> That merge list is getting long again. I tried to merge some changes I
> made
> that are nearer the end of it, but got conflicts so just abandoned the
> merge
> for the moment. Its definitely better if the list can be worked through in
> order from earlier to later changes...
>
> On 11/04/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > My understanding of the branching was that we created M2 so that the
> > new AMQP features could be moved to trunk and the _relatively_ stable
> > 0.8 implementation could be wound up for release before we spend a
> > good few months getting the next implementation ready.
> >
> > A good starting point would be with the set of of open bugs and
> > categorising them as M2 or M3 or later.
> >
> > I shall certainly do that with what I have open.
> >
> > The work that was done before on the legal notices won't work as we no
> > longer have that information in our repository. However one of the
> > driving forces behind the move to maven IIRC was to make this sort of
> > thing easier. Unfortunately I haven't heard from Steve V. in a while
> > as he would be the man with the answer, but maven must have a plug in
> > that can generate an Apache legal notice document based on the project
> > dependencies.
> >
> > The java trunk vs M2 difference is that I'm working mainly on M2
> > finishing off the various outstanding issues I have and
> > "theoretically" merging them to trunk as I go. Unfortunately, I've not
> > had time to do the merging which really needs done before trunk runs
> > off with too many new changes that prevents the merge.
> >
> > On 10/04/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > I can help as much as I can and I hope that some of the work that we
> put
> > in
> > > to the last release want have to be repeated.
> > > For example the legal notices, licenses etc.
> > >
> > > If there are any new dependencies that we have added please let us
> know.
> > I
> > > will create a wiki page to track M2 progress.
> > > I cut the M2 branch based on request by JPM. However I am (or the
> > community)
> > > is not sure what is happening where.
> > >
> > > What is going on in the java trunk vs the M2 branch ? are
> > > changes/improvements in the M2 being merged back to trunk?
> > > When is the plan for M2 release?
> > >
> > > So lets start there and capture the items that going in to this
> > release.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/10/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Rajith,
> > > >
> > > > Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let you
> know
> > > > being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few RCs.
> > > >
> > > > The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good
> > starting
> > > > read:
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> > > >
> > > > In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to
> much
> > > > development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we need
> to
> > > > set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked what
> > > > defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting and
> > > > merging any resulting defects.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks !
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did for
> M1.
> > I
> > > > > suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can
> create
> > RCs
> > > > ?
> > > > >
> > > > > We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for user
> > docs on
> > > > the
> > > > > non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first
> > release)
> > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Bye for now,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Marnie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
> > > > > > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of
> > progress,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > take it easy,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included
> > > > > > technologies)
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to
> opt
> > out
> > > > as
> > > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so
> > > > working
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before
> > riding
> > > > off
> > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a
> > little
> > > > > > less
> > > > > > > > > available !
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the
> > release in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > next
> > > > > > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this
> > release
> > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> > marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but
> a
> > > > little
> > > > > > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons
> other
> > > > than
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have
> no
> > -1's
> > > > or
> > > > > > > 0's
> > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so
> it
> > > > must be
> > > > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release
> > vote
> > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they
> look
> > like
> > > > > > this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the
> > > > python is
> > > > > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit
> > behind
> > > > this
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > status
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort
> > > > (hopefully
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our
> > > > efforts on
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > M2
> > > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker
> > code)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group
> > consensus.
> > > > I'll
> > > > > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Ritchie
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Rupert Smith <ru...@googlemail.com>.
That merge list is getting long again. I tried to merge some changes I made
that are nearer the end of it, but got conflicts so just abandoned the merge
for the moment. Its definitely better if the list can be worked through in
order from earlier to later changes...
On 11/04/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> My understanding of the branching was that we created M2 so that the
> new AMQP features could be moved to trunk and the _relatively_ stable
> 0.8 implementation could be wound up for release before we spend a
> good few months getting the next implementation ready.
>
> A good starting point would be with the set of of open bugs and
> categorising them as M2 or M3 or later.
>
> I shall certainly do that with what I have open.
>
> The work that was done before on the legal notices won't work as we no
> longer have that information in our repository. However one of the
> driving forces behind the move to maven IIRC was to make this sort of
> thing easier. Unfortunately I haven't heard from Steve V. in a while
> as he would be the man with the answer, but maven must have a plug in
> that can generate an Apache legal notice document based on the project
> dependencies.
>
> The java trunk vs M2 difference is that I'm working mainly on M2
> finishing off the various outstanding issues I have and
> "theoretically" merging them to trunk as I go. Unfortunately, I've not
> had time to do the merging which really needs done before trunk runs
> off with too many new changes that prevents the merge.
>
> On 10/04/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > I can help as much as I can and I hope that some of the work that we put
> in
> > to the last release want have to be repeated.
> > For example the legal notices, licenses etc.
> >
> > If there are any new dependencies that we have added please let us know.
> I
> > will create a wiki page to track M2 progress.
> > I cut the M2 branch based on request by JPM. However I am (or the
> community)
> > is not sure what is happening where.
> >
> > What is going on in the java trunk vs the M2 branch ? are
> > changes/improvements in the M2 being merged back to trunk?
> > When is the plan for M2 release?
> >
> > So lets start there and capture the items that going in to this
> release.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> >
> > On 4/10/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Rajith,
> > >
> > > Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let you know
> > > being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few RCs.
> > >
> > > The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good
> starting
> > > read:
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> > >
> > > In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to much
> > > development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we need to
> > > set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked what
> > > defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting and
> > > merging any resulting defects.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks !
> > > >
> > > > I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did for M1.
> I
> > > > suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can create
> RCs
> > > ?
> > > >
> > > > We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for user
> docs on
> > > the
> > > > non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first
> release)
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Bye for now,
> > > > Marnie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey Marnie,
> > > > >
> > > > > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
> > > > > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajith
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of
> progress,
> > > and
> > > > > > making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > take it easy,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included
> > > > > technologies)
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt
> out
> > > as
> > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so
> > > working
> > > > > to
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before
> riding
> > > off
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a
> little
> > > > > less
> > > > > > > > available !
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the
> release in
> > > the
> > > > > > > next
> > > > > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this
> release
> > > ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <
> marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a
> > > little
> > > > > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other
> > > than
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no
> -1's
> > > or
> > > > > > 0's
> > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it
> > > must be
> > > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release
> vote
> > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look
> like
> > > > > this:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the
> > > python is
> > > > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit
> behind
> > > this
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > status
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort
> > > (hopefully
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our
> > > efforts on
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > > M2
> > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker
> code)
> > > > > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group
> consensus.
> > > I'll
> > > > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Martin Ritchie
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
My understanding of the branching was that we created M2 so that the
new AMQP features could be moved to trunk and the _relatively_ stable
0.8 implementation could be wound up for release before we spend a
good few months getting the next implementation ready.
A good starting point would be with the set of of open bugs and
categorising them as M2 or M3 or later.
I shall certainly do that with what I have open.
The work that was done before on the legal notices won't work as we no
longer have that information in our repository. However one of the
driving forces behind the move to maven IIRC was to make this sort of
thing easier. Unfortunately I haven't heard from Steve V. in a while
as he would be the man with the answer, but maven must have a plug in
that can generate an Apache legal notice document based on the project
dependencies.
The java trunk vs M2 difference is that I'm working mainly on M2
finishing off the various outstanding issues I have and
"theoretically" merging them to trunk as I go. Unfortunately, I've not
had time to do the merging which really needs done before trunk runs
off with too many new changes that prevents the merge.
On 10/04/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I can help as much as I can and I hope that some of the work that we put in
> to the last release want have to be repeated.
> For example the legal notices, licenses etc.
>
> If there are any new dependencies that we have added please let us know. I
> will create a wiki page to track M2 progress.
> I cut the M2 branch based on request by JPM. However I am (or the community)
> is not sure what is happening where.
>
> What is going on in the java trunk vs the M2 branch ? are
> changes/improvements in the M2 being merged back to trunk?
> When is the plan for M2 release?
>
> So lets start there and capture the items that going in to this release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
>
> On 4/10/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Rajith,
> >
> > Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let you know
> > being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few RCs.
> >
> > The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good starting
> > read:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> >
> > In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to much
> > development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we need to
> > set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked what
> > defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting and
> > merging any resulting defects.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Rajith,
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > >
> > > I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did for M1. I
> > > suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can create RCs
> > ?
> > >
> > > We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for user docs on
> > the
> > > non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first release)
> > ...
> > >
> > > Bye for now,
> > > Marnie
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey Marnie,
> > > >
> > > > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
> > > > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
> > > >
> > > > Rajith
> > > >
> > > > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress,
> > and
> > > > > making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > take it easy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included
> > > > technologies)
> > > > > -
> > > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out
> > as
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so
> > working
> > > > to
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding
> > off
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little
> > > > less
> > > > > > > available !
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in
> > the
> > > > > > next
> > > > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release
> > ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a
> > little
> > > > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other
> > than
> > > > the
> > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's
> > or
> > > > > 0's
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it
> > must be
> > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote
> > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like
> > > > this:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the
> > python is
> > > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind
> > this
> > > > in
> > > > > > > status
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort
> > (hopefully
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our
> > efforts on
> > > > > an
> > > > > > M2
> > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus.
> > I'll
> > > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Martin Ritchie
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
I can help as much as I can and I hope that some of the work that we put in
to the last release want have to be repeated.
For example the legal notices, licenses etc.
If there are any new dependencies that we have added please let us know. I
will create a wiki page to track M2 progress.
I cut the M2 branch based on request by JPM. However I am (or the community)
is not sure what is happening where.
What is going on in the java trunk vs the M2 branch ? are
changes/improvements in the M2 being merged back to trunk?
When is the plan for M2 release?
So lets start there and capture the items that going in to this release.
Regards,
Rajith
On 4/10/07, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, Rajith,
>
> Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let you know
> being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few RCs.
>
> The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good starting
> read:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to much
> development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we need to
> set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked what
> defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting and
> merging any resulting defects.
>
> Regards
>
> Martin
>
> On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rajith,
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did for M1. I
> > suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can create RCs
> ?
> >
> > We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for user docs on
> the
> > non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first release)
> ...
> >
> > Bye for now,
> > Marnie
> >
> >
> > On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Marnie,
> > >
> > > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
> > > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > > >
> > > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress,
> and
> > > > making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
> > > >
> > > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > Marnie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Marnie,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > > >
> > > > > take it easy,
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajith
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included
> > > technologies)
> > > > -
> > > > > > thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out
> as
> > > > I'm
> > > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so
> working
> > > to
> > > > a
> > > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding
> off
> > > > > into
> > > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little
> > > less
> > > > > > available !
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in
> the
> > > > > next
> > > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release
> ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a
> little
> > > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other
> than
> > > the
> > > > > code
> > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's
> or
> > > > 0's
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it
> must be
> > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote
> > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like
> > > this:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the
> python is
> > > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind
> this
> > > in
> > > > > > status
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort
> (hopefully
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our
> efforts on
> > > > an
> > > > > M2
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus.
> I'll
> > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
Hi, Rajith,
Let me say thanks aswell for stepping forward but just to let you know
being the release manager is more than just cutting an a few RCs.
The incubator has a guide which is not yet complete but a good starting read:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
In addition to this though I would say that the M2 branch has to much
development on it to release just now. I would suggest that we need to
set a cut off point for development. Of course having marked what
defects are to be included in M2. Then re-branch for RC cutting and
merging any resulting defects.
Regards
Martin
On 10/04/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rajith,
>
> Thanks !
>
> I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did for M1. I
> suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can create RCs ?
>
> We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for user docs on the
> non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first release) ...
>
> Bye for now,
> Marnie
>
>
> On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Marnie,
> >
> > I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
> > I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> > >
> > > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> > >
> > > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress, and
> > > making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
> > >
> > > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Marnie
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Marnie,
> > > >
> > > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > > >
> > > > take it easy,
> > > >
> > > > Rajith
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included
> > technologies)
> > > -
> > > > > thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out as
> > > I'm
> > > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so working
> > to
> > > a
> > > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding off
> > > > into
> > > > > the sunset :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little
> > less
> > > > > available !
> > > > >
> > > > > Bfn,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in the
> > > > next
> > > > > > hour.
> > > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little
> > > > > > concerned
> > > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than
> > the
> > > > code
> > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or
> > > 0's
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be
> > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote
> > thread.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like
> > this:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is
> > > > > fairly
> > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this
> > in
> > > > > status
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on
> > > an
> > > > M2
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll
> > > email
> > > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Rajith,
Thanks !
I think we need to create a list of tasks for M2, as we did for M1. I
suspect there's a lot of cleaning up to be done before we can create RCs ?
We also need licenses etc all updated. A quick checlist for user docs on the
non-Java side is probably worthwhile (as this is their first release) ...
Bye for now,
Marnie
On 4/10/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Marnie,
>
> I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
> I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
>
> Rajith
>
> On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
> >
> > I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
> >
> > I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress, and
> > making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
> >
> > Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Marnie
> >
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Marnie,
> > >
> > > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> > >
> > > take it easy,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Rajith,
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included
> technologies)
> > -
> > > > thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out as
> > I'm
> > > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so working
> to
> > a
> > > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding off
> > > into
> > > > the sunset :-)
> > > >
> > > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little
> less
> > > > available !
> > > >
> > > > Bfn,
> > > > Marnie
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Marnie,
> > > > >
> > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in the
> > > next
> > > > > hour.
> > > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajith
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little
> > > > > concerned
> > > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than
> the
> > > code
> > > > > :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or
> > 0's
> > > > all
> > > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be
> > > > > included.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote
> thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like
> this:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is
> > > > fairly
> > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this
> in
> > > > status
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully
> > > from
> > > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on
> > an
> > > M2
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll
> > email
> > > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hey Marnie,
I will help as stated and I have already created a M2 branch.
I am waiting for folks to give the green light to cut the RC's
Rajith
On 4/10/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
>
> I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons.
>
> I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress, and
> making a reasonably robust project available to download/use.
>
> Now easy on the stampede ...... :-)
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Marnie
>
>
> On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Marnie,
> >
> > Hey np, I will take care of it.
> >
> > take it easy,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rajith,
> > >
> > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included technologies)
> -
> > > thanks.
> > >
> > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out as
> I'm
> > > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so working to
> a
> > > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding off
> > into
> > > the sunset :-)
> > >
> > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little less
> > > available !
> > >
> > > Bfn,
> > > Marnie
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Marnie,
> > > >
> > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in the
> > next
> > > > hour.
> > > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rajith
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little
> > > > concerned
> > > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than the
> > code
> > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marnie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or
> 0's
> > > all
> > > > > > the components in the vote
> > > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be
> > > > included.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Carl.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like this:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is
> > > fairly
> > > > > well
> > > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this in
> > > status
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully
> > from
> > > > > > Kevin).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on
> an
> > M2
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > only includes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > > > Java Client
> > > > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > > > Python Client
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll
> email
> > > > > > > separately
> > > > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > Marnie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>