You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> on 2014/08/18 21:42:27 UTC
Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Hi devs
Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
under common, hdfs, etc.
Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
tar-ed them back again.
The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
. Can someone please verify the signatures?
If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
Thanks
Karthik
PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@gmail.com>.
Verified MD5s and signatures of both SRC & BIN tarballs.
Thanks Karthik.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Tsuyoshi OZAWA <oz...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks Karthik for preparing new tar ball.
Verified MD5, SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 checksums.
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
--
- Tsuyoshi
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@gmail.com>.
Verified MD5s and signatures of both SRC & BIN tarballs.
Thanks Karthik.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Allen Wittenauer <aw...@apache.org>.
2.5.1 should fix HADOOP-10986 as well.
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Thanks Karthik.
>
> Arun
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the suggestions, gents.
>>
>> Given we are doing 2.5.1, I would like to get in HADOOP-10956 that fixes
>> the script. Is that alright with everyone?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> agree with Steve, lets do a 2.5.1 just with those txt files.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather
>> than
>>>> fix
>>>>> existing tarballs.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> do we already have enough last-minute fixes to trigger a rerelease?
>> With
>>>> all the testing that entails?
>>>>
>>>> A simple 2.5.1 rebuild with the same hadoop source tree would be a lot
>>>> easier to push out
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> Arun
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <
>> kasha@cloudera.com
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi devs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs
>>> don't
>>>>>> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are
>>>> only
>>>>>> under common, hdfs, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that we have already announced the release and the
>>>> jars/functionality
>>>>>> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones
>> that
>>>>>> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and
>>> copied
>>>>>> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory
>> and
>>>>>> tar-ed them back again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The updated tarballs are at:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
>>>>>> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Karthik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Arun C. Murthy
>>>>> Hortonworks Inc.
>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>> entity
>>>> to
>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> confidential,
>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>>> reader
>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified
>>>> that
>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>>> immediately
>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>> entity
>>> to
>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>> reader
>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>>> that
>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>> immediately
>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alejandro
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
+1.
Thanks Karthik.
Arun
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions, gents.
>
> Given we are doing 2.5.1, I would like to get in HADOOP-10956 that fixes
> the script. Is that alright with everyone?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > agree with Steve, lets do a 2.5.1 just with those txt files.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather
> than
> > > fix
> > > > existing tarballs.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > do we already have enough last-minute fixes to trigger a rerelease?
> With
> > > all the testing that entails?
> > >
> > > A simple 2.5.1 rebuild with the same hadoop source tree would be a lot
> > > easier to push out
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Arun
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <
> kasha@cloudera.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi devs
> > > > >
> > > > > Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs
> > don't
> > > > > have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are
> > > only
> > > > > under common, hdfs, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that we have already announced the release and the
> > > jars/functionality
> > > > > doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones
> that
> > > > > includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and
> > copied
> > > > > LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory
> and
> > > > > tar-ed them back again.
> > > > >
> > > > > The updated tarballs are at:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> > > > > . Can someone please verify the signatures?
> > > > >
> > > > > If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Karthik
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Arun C. Murthy
> > > > Hortonworks Inc.
> > > > http://hortonworks.com/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity
> > > to
> > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alejandro
> >
>
--
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>.
Thanks for the suggestions, gents.
Given we are doing 2.5.1, I would like to get in HADOOP-10956 that fixes
the script. Is that alright with everyone?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> agree with Steve, lets do a 2.5.1 just with those txt files.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than
> > fix
> > > existing tarballs.
> > >
> >
> >
> > do we already have enough last-minute fixes to trigger a rerelease? With
> > all the testing that entails?
> >
> > A simple 2.5.1 rebuild with the same hadoop source tree would be a lot
> > easier to push out
> >
> >
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Arun
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <kasha@cloudera.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi devs
> > > >
> > > > Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs
> don't
> > > > have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are
> > only
> > > > under common, hdfs, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Now that we have already announced the release and the
> > jars/functionality
> > > > doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> > > > includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and
> copied
> > > > LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> > > > tar-ed them back again.
> > > >
> > > > The updated tarballs are at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> > > > . Can someone please verify the signatures?
> > > >
> > > > If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Karthik
> > > >
> > > > PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > --
> > > Arun C. Murthy
> > > Hortonworks Inc.
> > > http://hortonworks.com/
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@cloudera.com>.
agree with Steve, lets do a 2.5.1 just with those txt files.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:
> On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than
> fix
> > existing tarballs.
> >
>
>
> do we already have enough last-minute fixes to trigger a rerelease? With
> all the testing that entails?
>
> A simple 2.5.1 rebuild with the same hadoop source tree would be a lot
> easier to push out
>
>
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi devs
> > >
> > > Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> > > have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are
> only
> > > under common, hdfs, etc.
> > >
> > > Now that we have already announced the release and the
> jars/functionality
> > > doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> > > includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> > > LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> > > tar-ed them back again.
> > >
> > > The updated tarballs are at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> > > . Can someone please verify the signatures?
> > >
> > > If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Karthik
> > >
> > > PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > --
> > Arun C. Murthy
> > Hortonworks Inc.
> > http://hortonworks.com/
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
Alejandro
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>.
On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
> existing tarballs.
>
do we already have enough last-minute fixes to trigger a rerelease? With
all the testing that entails?
A simple 2.5.1 rebuild with the same hadoop source tree would be a lot
easier to push out
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi devs
> >
> > Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> > have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> > under common, hdfs, etc.
> >
> > Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> > doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> > includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> > LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> > tar-ed them back again.
> >
> > The updated tarballs are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> > . Can someone please verify the signatures?
> >
> > If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Karthik
> >
> > PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
--
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@gmail.com>.
Verified MD5s and signatures of both SRC & BIN tarballs.
Thanks Karthik.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Andre Kelpe <ak...@concurrentinc.com>.
Are you guys aware that the 2.5.0 tarballs are already on the mirrors?
http://mirror.derwebwolf.net/apache/hadoop/common/hadoop-2.5.0/
- André
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
--
André Kelpe
andre@concurrentinc.com
http://concurrentinc.com
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
--
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Tsuyoshi OZAWA <oz...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks Karthik for preparing new tar ball.
Verified MD5, SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 checksums.
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
--
- Tsuyoshi
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Tsuyoshi OZAWA <oz...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks Karthik for preparing new tar ball.
Verified MD5, SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 checksums.
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
--
- Tsuyoshi
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Tsuyoshi OZAWA <oz...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks Karthik for preparing new tar ball.
Verified MD5, SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 checksums.
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
--
- Tsuyoshi
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
--
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Alejandro Abdelnur <tu...@gmail.com>.
Verified MD5s and signatures of both SRC & BIN tarballs.
Thanks Karthik.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files
Posted by Arun Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the top-level. Instead, they are only
> under common, hdfs, etc.
>
> Now that we have already announced the release and the jars/functionality
> doesn't change, I propose we just update the tarballs with ones that
> includes those files? I just untar-ed the published tarballs and copied
> LICENSE, NOTICE and README from under common to the top directory and
> tar-ed them back again.
>
> The updated tarballs are at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0/
> . Can someone please verify the signatures?
>
> If you would prefer an alternate action, please suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> PS: HADOOP-10956 should include the fix for these files also.
>
--
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.