You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Lukasz Lenart <lu...@apache.org> on 2022/11/08 15:13:27 UTC
[TEST] Apache Struts 6.1.0 test build is ready
Hello,
This is the first minor version of Struts 6.x series. Please take the
time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any
problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous 6.0.3 version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_6_1_0
Staging Maven repo
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
Standalone artifacts
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/struts/6.1.0/
Release notes
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+6.1.0
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.1.0 test build is ready
Posted by Lukasz Lenart <lu...@apache.org>.
What about sucha a change?
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/635
śr., 9 lis 2022 o 08:38 Lukasz Lenart <lu...@apache.org> napisał(a):
>
> wt., 8 lis 2022 o 21:30 info@flyingfischer.ch <in...@flyingfischer.ch>
> napisał(a):
> > I like the new feature to disable a specific interceptor within an
> > existing stack:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4173
> >
> > But this change has consequences:
> >
> > This basically means that each custom implementation of the class
> > Interceptor, now needs to add a method isDisabled(ActionInvocation). I'm
> > unsure if this affects many applications, but at least this is not a
> > drop-in replacement.
> >
> > I am not suggesting the roll back of the function, just want to share
> > this as a feedback to think about.
>
> Good point, this is a MINOR release so some breaking changes are
> allowed, but from the other side it would be better to have a smooth
> migration path for the users. Maybe I will add a "disableable
> interceptor" interface which will be used to check if a given
> interceptor should be disabled or not.
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention!
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.1.0 test build is ready
Posted by Lukasz Lenart <lu...@apache.org>.
wt., 8 lis 2022 o 21:30 info@flyingfischer.ch <in...@flyingfischer.ch>
napisał(a):
> I like the new feature to disable a specific interceptor within an
> existing stack:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4173
>
> But this change has consequences:
>
> This basically means that each custom implementation of the class
> Interceptor, now needs to add a method isDisabled(ActionInvocation). I'm
> unsure if this affects many applications, but at least this is not a
> drop-in replacement.
>
> I am not suggesting the roll back of the function, just want to share
> this as a feedback to think about.
Good point, this is a MINOR release so some breaking changes are
allowed, but from the other side it would be better to have a smooth
migration path for the users. Maybe I will add a "disableable
interceptor" interface which will be used to check if a given
interceptor should be disabled or not.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention!
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.1.0 test build is ready
Posted by "info@flyingfischer.ch" <in...@flyingfischer.ch>.
I like the new feature to disable a specific interceptor within an
existing stack:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4173
But this change has consequences:
This basically means that each custom implementation of the class
Interceptor, now needs to add a method isDisabled(ActionInvocation). I'm
unsure if this affects many applications, but at least this is not a
drop-in replacement.
I am not suggesting the roll back of the function, just want to share
this as a feedback to think about.
Best regards
Markus
Am 08.11.22 um 16:13 schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> Hello,
>
> This is the first minor version of Struts 6.x series. Please take the
> time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any
> problems you will spot.
>
> Here are the changes from the previous 6.0.3 version:
> https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_6_1_0
>
> Staging Maven repo
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
>
> Standalone artifacts
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/struts/6.1.0/
>
> Release notes
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+6.1.0
>
>
> Kind regards
> --
> Łukasz
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org