You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Russell E Glaue <rg...@cait.org> on 2011/06/28 16:33:30 UTC
Fwd: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987).
The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the PortOffset
in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to verify
it is still broken.
David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around to a
blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not
possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be able to
use the config-substitution file once again.
You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
-RG
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by Russell E Glaue <rg...@cait.org>.
Okay, I got it.
So then we should try to resolve this ActiveMQ issue (GERONIMO-5987) with the
code as is, without waiting for osgi DS, right? Or did you feel that we should
wait for osgi DS support in order to resolve the issue?
If we're not waiting for osgi DS, is it okay to try and get the issue resolved
temporarily using the etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file?
-RG
On 06/28/2011 01:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> ah.... declarative services (osgi DS) != spring DS (non-spec blueprint). I still think osgi DS is the way to go in the future, but its very unlikely I'll be able to work on this soon.
>
> sorry for the misunderstanding
>
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>
>> Oh okay, so then the Declarative Services will just be used to configure
>> ActiveMQ? Or have you decided this is not the best route all together?
>>
>> -RG
>>
>>
>> On 06/28/2011 10:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>> I am definitely not replacing blueprint with spring DS. I spent a lot of time going the other way.
>>>
>>> I think the problem with the placeholder config file is that we aren't running enough of the felix or karaf deployers. There's one that reads these config files and stuffs the data into config admin. I didn't realize how this was supposed to work when I came up with the xbean-blueprint stuff. There are several karaf features that we need in geronimo (mostly "features") and I hope to have enough time to get them in soon.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Jun 28, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>>>
>>>> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987).
>>>>
>>>> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the PortOffset
>>>> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to verify
>>>> it is still broken.
>>>>
>>>> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
>>>> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
>>>> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>>>>
>>>> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around to a
>>>> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not
>>>> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be able to
>>>> use the config-substitution file once again.
>>>>
>>>> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
>>>> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
>>>> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>>>>
>>>> -RG
>>>> <[CONF] Apache Geronimo v3_0 > Changing the default port numbers.eml>
>>>
>
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
ah.... declarative services (osgi DS) != spring DS (non-spec blueprint). I still think osgi DS is the way to go in the future, but its very unlikely I'll be able to work on this soon.
sorry for the misunderstanding
david jencks
On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> Oh okay, so then the Declarative Services will just be used to configure
> ActiveMQ? Or have you decided this is not the best route all together?
>
> -RG
>
>
> On 06/28/2011 10:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>> I am definitely not replacing blueprint with spring DS. I spent a lot of time going the other way.
>>
>> I think the problem with the placeholder config file is that we aren't running enough of the felix or karaf deployers. There's one that reads these config files and stuffs the data into config admin. I didn't realize how this was supposed to work when I came up with the xbean-blueprint stuff. There are several karaf features that we need in geronimo (mostly "features") and I hope to have enough time to get them in soon.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>>
>>> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987).
>>>
>>> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the PortOffset
>>> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to verify
>>> it is still broken.
>>>
>>> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
>>> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
>>> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>>>
>>> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around to a
>>> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not
>>> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be able to
>>> use the config-substitution file once again.
>>>
>>> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
>>> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
>>> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>>>
>>> -RG
>>> <[CONF] Apache Geronimo v3_0 > Changing the default port numbers.eml>
>>
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by Russell E Glaue <rg...@cait.org>.
Oh okay, so then the Declarative Services will just be used to configure
ActiveMQ? Or have you decided this is not the best route all together?
-RG
On 06/28/2011 10:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I am definitely not replacing blueprint with spring DS. I spent a lot of time going the other way.
>
> I think the problem with the placeholder config file is that we aren't running enough of the felix or karaf deployers. There's one that reads these config files and stuffs the data into config admin. I didn't realize how this was supposed to work when I came up with the xbean-blueprint stuff. There are several karaf features that we need in geronimo (mostly "features") and I hope to have enough time to get them in soon.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>
>> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987).
>>
>> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the PortOffset
>> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to verify
>> it is still broken.
>>
>> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
>> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
>> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>>
>> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around to a
>> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not
>> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be able to
>> use the config-substitution file once again.
>>
>> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
>> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
>> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>>
>> -RG
>> <[CONF] Apache Geronimo v3_0 > Changing the default port numbers.eml>
>
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I am definitely not replacing blueprint with spring DS. I spent a lot of time going the other way.
I think the problem with the placeholder config file is that we aren't running enough of the felix or karaf deployers. There's one that reads these config files and stuffs the data into config admin. I didn't realize how this was supposed to work when I came up with the xbean-blueprint stuff. There are several karaf features that we need in geronimo (mostly "features") and I hope to have enough time to get them in soon.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 28, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987).
>
> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the PortOffset
> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to verify
> it is still broken.
>
> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>
> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around to a
> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not
> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be able to
> use the config-substitution file once again.
>
> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>
> -RG
> <[CONF] Apache Geronimo v3_0 > Changing the default port numbers.eml>
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by Russell E Glaue <rg...@cait.org>.
Yes - I am on pins and needles to be able to resolve this issue.
This issue prevents the javaee6 server from running multiple instances.
The ActiveMQ temporary directory is also an issue. It cannot be changed
currently due to the same problem. So starting up a second instance under the
same install base freezes, caused by a race condition for the same lock-file on
disk. It should use a temp directory under org.apache.geronimo.server.name and
not org.apache.geronimo.server.home .
-RG
On 06/28/2011 09:57 AM, chi runhua wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I've removed the line about ActiveMQ port setting
> on that page.
>
> Hopefully, we could test the changes from D.J very soon.
>
> Jeff C
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Russell E Glaue <rglaue@cait.org
> <ma...@cait.org>> wrote:
>
> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time
> (GERONIMO-5987).
>
> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the
> PortOffset
> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's
> snapshot to verify
> it is still broken.
>
> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>
> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a
> work-around to a
> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it
> is not
> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we
> should be able to
> use the config-substitution file once again.
>
> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>
> -RG
>
>
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by Russell E Glaue <rg...@cait.org>.
I think you were right to have something in their about ActiveMQ, since it
currently does not work as documented.
So I added a note about it, and referenced the JIRA.
Thanks.
-RG
On 06/28/2011 09:57 AM, chi runhua wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I've removed the line about ActiveMQ port setting
> on that page.
>
> Hopefully, we could test the changes from D.J very soon.
>
> Jeff C
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Russell E Glaue <rglaue@cait.org
> <ma...@cait.org>> wrote:
>
> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time
> (GERONIMO-5987).
>
> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the
> PortOffset
> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's
> snapshot to verify
> it is still broken.
>
> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>
> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a
> work-around to a
> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it
> is not
> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we
> should be able to
> use the config-substitution file once again.
>
> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>
> -RG
>
>
Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo v3.0 > Changing the default port numbers
Posted by chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the info. I've removed the line about ActiveMQ port setting on
that page.
Hopefully, we could test the changes from D.J very soon.
Jeff C
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Russell E Glaue <rg...@cait.org> wrote:
> The edit made to the G3.0 wiki is not correct at this time (GERONIMO-5987).
>
> The etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg is not used to change the
> PortOffset
> in current trunk nor in 3.0-M1. I just tested this morning's snapshot to
> verify
> it is still broken.
>
> David Jencks is working to replace Blueprint with Spring DS. After which
> hopefully this issue will be resolved, and the
> etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file will be removed.
>
> That etc/blueprint-activemq-placeholder.cfg config file was a work-around
> to a
> blueprint issue, and the work-around is also broken. So currently it is not
> possible to change the ActiveMQ Port. And when it is fixed, we should be
> able to
> use the config-substitution file once again.
>
> You can refer to our previous conversation about this matter.
> See this thread: ActiveMQ config-substitution change G2.2 vs G3.0,
> http://markmail.org/message/bf6uta2o3fuesiki
>
> -RG
>