You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/12/09 09:00:06 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32597] -
modified selector attribute "update=fase" doesn't work
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32597>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32597
jan@materne.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|dev@ant.apache.org |jan@materne.de
------- Additional Comments From jan@materne.de 2004-12-09 09:00 -------
I could verify that.
1. update="false" should not change the cache file. That is the intention.
2. A very small testcase
<fileset dir="."><modified update="false"/></fileset>
has created the cache file, but shouldnt.
A first quick view into the source [1] has shown
public boolean isSelected(...) {
...
// Maybe update the cache
if (update && rv) {
cache.put(f.getAbsolutePath(), newValue);
setModified(getModified() + 1);
if (!getDelayUpdate()) {
saveCache();
}
}
...
}
But maybe the error is somewhere deeper. I have to have a deeper look into that
(and prepare a JUnit testcase of course :)
[1]
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/select
ors/modifiedselector/ModifiedSelector.java?rev=1.14&view=markup
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org