AW: Almost-Solved - Huge size of Output PDF when inserting 49 SVG Images

[mi...@post.ch]

Back ...

I did the java modifications you proposed, and it worked. ;-)

As you already said, there is a scaling problem still to be solved. In my specific case, my FO documents has inline- and block-progression-dimension as image block parameters set to specific centimeters values. Does the actual FOP implementation still handle this case (as it was the case in the previous version)?

Again thank you for your precious help

Lawrence

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:dev.jeremias@greenmail.ch] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 15:28
An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Not-Solved - Huge size of Output PDF when inserting 49 SVG Images


Remember the little catch I wrote about yesterday? There's a work-around
there. I don't know if it fixes everything but at least the scaling.

On 20.07.2005 15:20:19 michella wrote:
> But the quality of insertion is really bad. It won't stick it in the
> middle, and don't have it sized as specified in the SVG header width
> and height. (the old version of fop did the work properly!). Here the sample
> FO and SVG header :


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: AW: Almost-Solved - Huge size of Output PDF when inserting 49 SVG Images

[Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>]

On 20.07.2005 16:36:37 michella wrote:
> Back ...
> 
> I did the java modifications you proposed, and it worked. ;-)
> 
> As you already said, there is a scaling problem still to be solved. In
> my specific case, my FO documents has inline- and
> block-progression-dimension as image block parameters set to specific
> centimeters values. Does the actual FOP implementation still handle
> this case (as it was the case in the previous version)?

I'm not sure I understand you. Can you provide an example of what you
mean? FOP 1.0 (when it's available) is supposed to handle all the
properties on fo:external-graphic which the XSL 1.0 spec describes. 


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org