You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> on 2005/06/08 17:37:50 UTC
Re: svn commit: r189572 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
jorton@apache.org wrote:
>Author: jorton
>Date: Wed Jun 8 04:23:32 2005
>New Revision: 189572
>
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189572&view=rev
>Log:
>Synch with 2.0.x branch.
>
>Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>
>Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES?rev=189572&r1=189571&r2=189572&view=diff
>==============================================================================
>--- httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES (original)
>+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Wed Jun 8 04:23:32 2005
>@@ -8,11 +8,6 @@
> *) mod_cache: Rename 'generate_name' to 'ap_cache_generate_name'.
> [Paul Querna]
>
>- *) SECURITY: CAN-2005-1268 (cve.mitre.org)
>- mod_ssl: Fix possible crash on printing CRL details when
>- debugging is enabled, if configured to use a CRL from
>- a malicious source. PR 35081. [Marc Stern <mstern csc.com>]
>-
> *) proxy FTP: Fix confusion about globbing characters which could lead
> to getting a directory listing when a file was requested. PR 34512.
> [Sean <infamous41md hotmail.com>]
>@@ -64,9 +59,6 @@
> *) Add AP_INIT_TAKE_ARGV for configuration commands. (minor MMN bump)
> [Paul Querna]
>
>- *) worker and event mpms: don't take down the whole server for a transient
>- thread creation failure. PR 34514 [Greg Ames]
>-
>
>
Uhm, so this change never got applied to the event mpm, since it was
completely removed from the 2.1.x changelog, and the event mpm doesn't
exist in 2.0.x. :)
I believe that we should be keeping items in the 2.1.x changelog at
this point, since we have done several releases....
> *) ap_get_local_host() rewritten for APR. [Jim Jagielski]
>
> *) Add the ap_vhost_iterate_given_conn function to expose the information
>@@ -83,11 +75,6 @@
> applications that send the Vary Header themselves, and also apply
> mod_defalte as an output filter. [Paul Querna]
>
>- *) mod_rewrite: use buffered I/O for RewriteMap txt: files. This
>- can result in a major performance improvement when the files are
>- large.
>- [Greg Ames]
>-
> *) Change the default (when not present in the config file) setting
> for UseCanonicalName to Off.
> [Joshua Slive]
>@@ -722,7 +709,21 @@
> Apache 2.0.xx tree as documented, and except as noted, below.]
>
> Changes with Apache 2.0.55
>+
>+ *) SECURITY: CAN-2005-1268 (cve.mitre.org)
>+ mod_ssl: Fix off-by-one overflow whilst printing CRL information
>+ at "LogLevel debug" which could be triggered if configured
>+ to use a "malicious" CRL. PR 35081. [Marc Stern <mstern csc.com>]
>+
>+ *) mod_userdir: Fix possible memory corruption issue. PR 34588.
>+ [David Leonard <dleonard vintela.com>]
>+
>+ *) worker MPM: don't take down the whole server for a transient
>+ thread creation failure. PR 34514. [Greg Ames]
>
>+ *) mod_rewrite: use buffered I/O to improve performance with large
>+ RewriteMap txt: files. [Greg Ames]
>+
> *) proxy HTTP: Rework the handling of request bodies to handle
> chunked input and input filters which modify content length, and
> avoid spooling arbitrary-sized request bodies in memory.
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r189572 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On 6/9/05, Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:37:50AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> > I believe that we should be keeping items in the 2.1.x changelog at
> > this point, since we have done several releases....
>
> Ah, sorry, I remember the discussion about this previously but didn't
> remember if there was consensus on what to do. So we should just not
> bother synching up the 2.0.x CHANGES in the trunk at all? I think that
> makes sense.
I thought there were more in favor of the other alternative, but I
don't think it is so important either way, as long as everybody knows
(2.0.x/STATUS???) to do the same thing.
Re: svn commit: r189572 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Posted by Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:37:50AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> I believe that we should be keeping items in the 2.1.x changelog at
> this point, since we have done several releases....
Ah, sorry, I remember the discussion about this previously but didn't
remember if there was consensus on what to do. So we should just not
bother synching up the 2.0.x CHANGES in the trunk at all? I think that
makes sense.
joe