You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hawq.apache.org by "Ed Espino (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/30 00:50:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HAWQ-952) Clean up COPYRIGHT file and review NOTICE File

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400325#comment-15400325 ] 

Ed Espino commented on HAWQ-952:
--------------------------------

*Regarding COPYRIGHT file*

*Concern:* This is a non-standard Apache software license file.  See Apache documentation relating to NOTICE, LICENSE, source headers.

*Comments:*
  * The file is derived from the third-party PostgreSQL COPYRIGHT file.  As expected, for an Apache release, it's contents have been incorporated into the LICENSE file.
* To honor "TREATMENT OF THIRD-PARTY WORKS" "Do not modify or remove any copyright notices or licenses within third-party works.", we need to consider leaving it intact and possibly referencing it in the LICENSE file to help avoid confusion?

References
* http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
* http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-notice

> Clean up COPYRIGHT file and review NOTICE File
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAWQ-952
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-952
>             Project: Apache HAWQ
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Goden Yao
>            Assignee: Ed Espino
>             Fix For: 2.0.0.0-incubating
>
>
> Per mentor's suggestion, we should not have a separate COPYRIGHT file 
> And we need to review which copyright should be in NOTICE file in what way.
> (need more clarification and discussion with mentors)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)