JMS bridge v. network of brokers

[Geoffrey Arnold <ge...@geoffreyarnold.com>]

Hi All,

I'm trying to form a topology where queues hosted on independent  
brokers (separate machines) are consolidated into a single queue on a  
central broker.  Messages will be consumed by listeners on that  
central broker.  Independent brokers will come on and off the network.

Originally I thought that this could be solved by creating a JMS-to- 
JMS bridge, but after reading the docs it could fit into the Network  
of Brokers model.  However the docs indicate that network of brokers  
should not be used for consuming messages.

How should this work?  Any thoughts on how to handle the dynamic  
nature of this topology would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Geoff.

Re: JMS bridge v. network of brokers

[Geoffrey Arnold <ge...@gmail.com>]

Many thanks, Joe, those examples were exactly what I needed.

Best,
Geoff.

On Oct 15, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Joe Fernandez wrote:

>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> A Network of Brokers (NoB) is set up so that you can forward  
> messages from
> one broker to another in the NoB. A connection between two brokers  
> in the
> NoB is also referred to as a forwarding bridge.  See the following
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
>
> AMQ 5.3 comes with a couple of example cfg files to set up a simple  
> 2 node
> NoB.
>
> Joe
> http://www.ttmsolutions.com
>
>
>
> Geoffrey Arnold wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm trying to form a topology where queues hosted on independent
>> brokers (separate machines) are consolidated into a single queue on a
>> central broker.  Messages will be consumed by listeners on that
>> central broker.  Independent brokers will come on and off the  
>> network.
>>
>> Originally I thought that this could be solved by creating a JMS-to-
>> JMS bridge, but after reading the docs it could fit into the Network
>> of Brokers model.  However the docs indicate that network of brokers
>> should not be used for consuming messages.
>>
>> How should this work?  Any thoughts on how to handle the dynamic
>> nature of this topology would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Geoff.
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-bridge-v.-network-of-brokers-tp25912794p25913033.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: JMS bridge v. network of brokers

[Joe Fernandez <jo...@ttmsolutions.com>]

Hi Geoff,

A Network of Brokers (NoB) is set up so that you can forward messages from
one broker to another in the NoB. A connection between two brokers in the
NoB is also referred to as a forwarding bridge.  See the following 

http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html

AMQ 5.3 comes with a couple of example cfg files to set up a simple 2 node
NoB. 

Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com



Geoffrey Arnold wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm trying to form a topology where queues hosted on independent  
> brokers (separate machines) are consolidated into a single queue on a  
> central broker.  Messages will be consumed by listeners on that  
> central broker.  Independent brokers will come on and off the network.
> 
> Originally I thought that this could be solved by creating a JMS-to- 
> JMS bridge, but after reading the docs it could fit into the Network  
> of Brokers model.  However the docs indicate that network of brokers  
> should not be used for consuming messages.
> 
> How should this work?  Any thoughts on how to handle the dynamic  
> nature of this topology would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Geoff.
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-bridge-v.-network-of-brokers-tp25912794p25913033.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.