You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> on 2015/02/12 18:03:01 UTC
Release of 0.1
Hi,
what needs to be done for a 0.1 release of Tamaya?
BYe,
Oliver
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf
Re: Release of 0.1
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Yep, guess time for another vote;-)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also wanted to raise that question (I was some days sick, so you were
> faster ;-D )...
>
> If extensions must be moved out to a separate tree. I think some extensions
> already work qute well (resolver( and just need some tests and docs,
> whereas many others definitively require more time.
> So if we can separate extensions somehow (even perhaps manage in a seperate
> source tree), I would agree that API and core are rather stable.
> Things to be done:
> - Checking for accurate Javadocs
> - Checking improving API/Core Documentation
> - Ensure we have a release build, which also updates our web page on
> successful build with Javadocs, asciidocs (may be coping the generated
> html...? )
> Ensuring the delivery tool chain works ;)
>
> Best
> Anatole
>
>
>
> 2015-02-12 18:06 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> > IMO for core we can release (I'd like to release a 0.1-alpha but with
> > our incubating it makes too long ;))
> >
> > for extensions I think it is too early so maybe we should remove them
> > from main tree and release them separately when someone need it in
> > alpha or experimental until we manage to discuss them and integrate
> > them back in main tree
> >
> > wdyt?
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2015-02-12 18:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what needs to be done for a 0.1 release of Tamaya?
> > >
> > > BYe,
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > --
> > > N Oliver B. Fischer
> > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > > P +49 30 44793251
> > > M +49 178 7903538
> > > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > > S oliver.b.fischer
> > > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > > X http://xing.to/obf
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Anatole Tresch*
> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
> Glärnischweg 10
> CH - 8620 Wetzikon
>
> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> *Twitter: @atsticks*
> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
>
> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
>
Re: Release of 0.1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Well it is fine to have an extension tree. We just need to ensure we got
some discussion on what we release and extensions are not yet a priority
but we can set it as priority for 0.2 for instance.
Le 13 févr. 2015 08:10, "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> a
écrit :
> I would like to go on and to develop my extensions on GitHub as separate
> project. Later, if they is an existing user community, I can contribute
> them. So for me it would be fine if the builder and JSON module would be
> removed from the tree.
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 12.02.15 um 18:21 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
>
>> I also wanted to raise that question (I was some days sick, so you were
>> faster ;-D )...
>>
>> If extensions must be moved out to a separate tree. I think some
>> extensions
>> already work qute well (resolver( and just need some tests and docs,
>> whereas many others definitively require more time.
>> So if we can separate extensions somehow (even perhaps manage in a
>> seperate
>> source tree), I would agree that API and core are rather stable.
>> Things to be done:
>> - Checking for accurate Javadocs
>> - Checking improving API/Core Documentation
>> - Ensure we have a release build, which also updates our web page on
>> successful build with Javadocs, asciidocs (may be coping the generated
>> html...? )
>> Ensuring the delivery tool chain works ;)
>>
>> Best
>> Anatole
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-02-12 18:06 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> IMO for core we can release (I'd like to release a 0.1-alpha but with
>>> our incubating it makes too long ;))
>>>
>>> for extensions I think it is too early so maybe we should remove them
>>> from main tree and release them separately when someone need it in
>>> alpha or experimental until we manage to discuss them and integrate
>>> them back in main tree
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-02-12 18:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>
Re: Release of 0.1
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
Why gh? It would be awsome other colluegues can join your ideas and help on them once they have reached the required level of maturity...
-
Anatole Tresch
Glärnischweg 10
8620 Wetzikon
Tel +41 (43) 317 05 30
-
Send from Mobile
> Am 13.02.2015 um 08:06 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
>
> I would like to go on and to develop my extensions on GitHub as separate project. Later, if they is an existing user community, I can contribute them. So for me it would be fine if the builder and JSON module would be removed from the tree.
>
> Oliver
>
>> Am 12.02.15 um 18:21 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
>> I also wanted to raise that question (I was some days sick, so you were
>> faster ;-D )...
>>
>> If extensions must be moved out to a separate tree. I think some extensions
>> already work qute well (resolver( and just need some tests and docs,
>> whereas many others definitively require more time.
>> So if we can separate extensions somehow (even perhaps manage in a seperate
>> source tree), I would agree that API and core are rather stable.
>> Things to be done:
>> - Checking for accurate Javadocs
>> - Checking improving API/Core Documentation
>> - Ensure we have a release build, which also updates our web page on
>> successful build with Javadocs, asciidocs (may be coping the generated
>> html...? )
>> Ensuring the delivery tool chain works ;)
>>
>> Best
>> Anatole
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-02-12 18:06 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> IMO for core we can release (I'd like to release a 0.1-alpha but with
>>> our incubating it makes too long ;))
>>>
>>> for extensions I think it is too early so maybe we should remove them
>>> from main tree and release them separately when someone need it in
>>> alpha or experimental until we manage to discuss them and integrate
>>> them back in main tree
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-02-12 18:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
Re: Release of 0.1
Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
I would like to go on and to develop my extensions on GitHub as separate
project. Later, if they is an existing user community, I can contribute
them. So for me it would be fine if the builder and JSON module would be
removed from the tree.
Oliver
Am 12.02.15 um 18:21 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
> I also wanted to raise that question (I was some days sick, so you were
> faster ;-D )...
>
> If extensions must be moved out to a separate tree. I think some extensions
> already work qute well (resolver( and just need some tests and docs,
> whereas many others definitively require more time.
> So if we can separate extensions somehow (even perhaps manage in a seperate
> source tree), I would agree that API and core are rather stable.
> Things to be done:
> - Checking for accurate Javadocs
> - Checking improving API/Core Documentation
> - Ensure we have a release build, which also updates our web page on
> successful build with Javadocs, asciidocs (may be coping the generated
> html...? )
> Ensuring the delivery tool chain works ;)
>
> Best
> Anatole
>
>
>
> 2015-02-12 18:06 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> IMO for core we can release (I'd like to release a 0.1-alpha but with
>> our incubating it makes too long ;))
>>
>> for extensions I think it is too early so maybe we should remove them
>> from main tree and release them separately when someone need it in
>> alpha or experimental until we manage to discuss them and integrate
>> them back in main tree
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-02-12 18:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
>
>
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf
Re: Release of 0.1
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
I also wanted to raise that question (I was some days sick, so you were
faster ;-D )...
If extensions must be moved out to a separate tree. I think some extensions
already work qute well (resolver( and just need some tests and docs,
whereas many others definitively require more time.
So if we can separate extensions somehow (even perhaps manage in a seperate
source tree), I would agree that API and core are rather stable.
Things to be done:
- Checking for accurate Javadocs
- Checking improving API/Core Documentation
- Ensure we have a release build, which also updates our web page on
successful build with Javadocs, asciidocs (may be coping the generated
html...? )
Ensuring the delivery tool chain works ;)
Best
Anatole
2015-02-12 18:06 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> IMO for core we can release (I'd like to release a 0.1-alpha but with
> our incubating it makes too long ;))
>
> for extensions I think it is too early so maybe we should remove them
> from main tree and release them separately when someone need it in
> alpha or experimental until we manage to discuss them and integrate
> them back in main tree
>
> wdyt?
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-02-12 18:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what needs to be done for a 0.1 release of Tamaya?
> >
> > BYe,
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > --
> > N Oliver B. Fischer
> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > P +49 30 44793251
> > M +49 178 7903538
> > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > S oliver.b.fischer
> > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > X http://xing.to/obf
> >
>
--
*Anatole Tresch*
Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
Glärnischweg 10
CH - 8620 Wetzikon
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*Twitter: @atsticks*
*Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
<http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
*Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
Re: Release of 0.1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
IMO for core we can release (I'd like to release a 0.1-alpha but with
our incubating it makes too long ;))
for extensions I think it is too early so maybe we should remove them
from main tree and release them separately when someone need it in
alpha or experimental until we manage to discuss them and integrate
them back in main tree
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-12 18:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>:
> Hi,
>
> what needs to be done for a 0.1 release of Tamaya?
>
> BYe,
>
> Oliver
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>