You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by "gengliangwang (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/02/21 18:54:24 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] gengliangwang commented on a diff in pull request #40080: [SPARK-42406]Fix check for missing required fields.

gengliangwang commented on code in PR #40080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40080#discussion_r1113456047


##########
connector/protobuf/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/protobuf/ProtobufSerdeSuite.scala:
##########
@@ -144,44 +146,52 @@ class ProtobufSerdeSuite extends SharedSparkSession with ProtobufTestBase {
   test("Fail to convert with missing Catalyst fields") {
     val protoFile = ProtobufUtils.buildDescriptor(testFileDesc, "FieldMissingInSQLRoot")
 
-    // serializing with extra fails if extra field is missing in SQL Schema
+    val foobarSQLType = DataType.fromDDL(
+      "struct<foo string>" // "bar" is missing.

Review Comment:
   Shall we test catalyst schema which contains `bar` only and there is a result returned?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org