Re: Early review of DUCC pre-release - DUCC Web Server

[Lou DeGenaro <lo...@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the several issues you raised here.  I believe that all have now
been addressed by Jira 3465.

Lou.


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:

> The docs say this is accessed at port 42133.  Is this configurable?
> ------
>
> The docs mention two display modes: scroll mode and classic mode.  The
> website
> has "Table Style" for scroll/classic.  Is Table Style the same as "Display
> Modes"?
>
> ------
> A recent version of the ducc webserver I tried (not sure if it's the
> identical-to-trunk level), had some issues:
> In Google Chrome browser,  switching to Scroll mode made the header row
> have
> column widths that were much wider than the rest of the data in the table,
> so
> they didn't line up (even after trying both kinds of "reloading");  Firefox
> didn't have this issue.  Is there a "recommended/required" browser people
> need
> to use?
>
> Another issue was (in Firefox) the header columns don't re-size (in scroll
> mode)
> when you change the browser width, even after refreshing with the "refresh"
> button in the web page (but they do resize if you use firefox's own
> refresh button).
>
> After picking a sort index, the direction arrows become very hard to see
> on that
> column (the color / size makes it hard to see them).  There's no apparant
> way to
> "undo" the sort picking; you can sort on another column, of course.  (And,
> I
> discovered that if you do a firefox-refresh (not the special in-the-page
> refresh
> button), it seems to undo the sort - not sure this is working as designed
> though).
>
> Is any kind of multi-column sorting supported?  If I sort on one column,
> and
> then pick on another column as the sort key, do items that have now have
> the
> same sort key value, retain the ordering they had before the resort?
>
>
> -Marshall
> On 11/20/2013 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > I've started to do some preliminary review of the DUCC, in preparation
> for its
> > release.
> >
> > A scan of the code for the phrase "GPL" turns up some things:
> >
> > Maven detects there's some dependencies on JAXB in the project duccdocs,
> (which
> > seems unusual?), and finds that JAXB is a dependency (??) which is dual
> licensed
> > under CDDL and GPL. Does duccdocs really need to have a dependency on
> JAXB?
> >
> > DataTables-1.9.1 has a 3rd version of jquery.js which includes Sizzle.js
> > licensed under the MIT, BSD, GPL.  I think this probably means "triple
> licensed"
> > but I guess it could mean that all of them might apply to different
> parts?  If
> > you look at the current Sizzle.js it is only licensed under the MIT
> license.
> >
> > The jquery.js file is in the source svn 6 times, at multiple (3 or more)
> > versions.  Is this desired?
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> >
> >
>
>