You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/29 08:58:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1830) travis.yml
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1830.
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.15.0
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Resolution: Fixed
> travis.yml
> ----------
>
> Key: JENA-1830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1830
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.15.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Jena has several JVM versions in the Travis setup. In addition, the Jenkins server has full build and test runs.
> I use Travis (free option) to verify development changes but the build process is not perfect. A complete cycle is 5 travis builds and if any one fails, the job is flagged in error. The errors are not Jena related - they are build environment issues reflected as maven build problems.
> In the last 50 jobs without development failures, I got 24 green, 22 failed one or two jobs and 4 build system fails. So I get 40% false reports of code failures.
> The individual fails were distributed as:
> Java8 : 3
> Java9 : 3
> Java10: 4
> Java11: 2
> Java12: 10
> The problem is that with 5 fairly reliable jobs, the probablity of a "failed" build is increased. This is semi-interactive feedback, unlike Jenkins which is a daily set of builds.
> I propose having LTS (8,11, and soon 14).
> Jenkins will provide the more complete testing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)