You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to modperl@perl.apache.org by Paul <yd...@yahoo.com> on 2000/12/08 19:38:36 UTC
[me too] certification [Was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]
First, the gratuitous "me, too!"
As fair warning, there's little more than that in terms of valid
content here, but if you're still interested in reading the rest....
--- "J. J. Horner" <jh...@2jnetworks.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:22:26PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > >>>>> "Gunther" == Gunther Birznieks <gu...@extropia.com> writes:
> > Gunther> This is exactly why someone experienced in training (ie
> > Gunther> Randal/StoneHenge) would hopefully be the ones to take the
> > Gunther> torch on this. If there's anyone I would trust a
> > Gunther> certification from, it would be them.
> >
> > We've considered the certification route from time to time, but
> > other than being a money maker for us (which isn't all that bad
> > of a deal :-),
> > I'm still not entirely convinced that the community of *ours*
> > would demand certification in any distinguishing way.
> >
> > I mean, until I can demonstrate that people with certs are likely
> > to get hired faster or make more money, what's the point? As it is
> > now, good mod_perl people are hard enough to find that the
jobseeker
> > already has the advantage.
> >
> > I'm very open to being convinced otherwise though.
> >
>
> I'd be interested in something like this. For a low price
> ($50-$100),
I would do that. In fact, I would probably pay more.
> I'd take a list of activities from your website, complete the
> activities, submit my code back to you, and let you grade me,
> and then send me some form of certificate saying
> "Certified mod_perl hacker" with Stonehenge and the famous
> merlyn signing it.
I'd be a little less eager about the sort of simple multiple choice
that would be easiest to automate, but even that would suffice.
> If we could get Doug and Lincoln to sign off on the list of
> activities, the certification couldn't get more genuine than that.
Agreed.
[snip]
> How many technologies have the actual creator as part of the
> certification process? It could only help.
I don't know about "only", but I second the sentiment.
I would love to be able to list on my resum� that I was Perl and
mod_perl certified. How about publicity in the form of a page listing
certified Perl/modPerl coders on take23, with contact info if they
like? Great for getting those job offers.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
Re: [me too] certification [Was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]
Posted by Jay Jacobs <ja...@lach.net>.
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:22:26PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > >
> > > I mean, until I can demonstrate that people with certs are likely
> > > to get hired faster or make more money, what's the point? As it is
> > > now, good mod_perl people are hard enough to find that the
> > > jobseeker already has the advantage.
"The jobseeker already has the advantage" is the key phrase. I think the
general idea is to balance that out and broaden both the job market for
mod_perl folks, and the talent pool of mod_perl programmers. At this
point, IMO certification is the end of the line, the destination. What we
need is a path to the destination. We want to generate enough interest
and (dare I say) marketability of mod_perl to warrant certification.
Articles are helpful, but when was the last time you saw a corporate
big-wig reading TPJ or Perl Month? I'm sure it happens, but what about
getting an article in the big trade rags? Slipping something in
Ziff-Davis rags, the things that sit on their desk and coffee tables...
> > I'd take a list of activities from your website, complete the
> > activities, submit my code back to you, and let you grade me,
<snip>
Copy and paste works wonders in the web. You'd need heavy code-commenting
or a detailed explanation from the person (preferably in person) of the
code they "wrote". It's the right path, just need to prepare for the
lowest common denomenator.
> I'd be a little less eager about the sort of simple multiple choice
> that would be easiest to automate, but even that would suffice.
Or a good combination thereof.
> I would love to be able to list on my resum� that I was Perl and
> mod_perl certified. How about publicity in the form of a page listing
> certified Perl/modPerl coders on take23, with contact info if they
> like? Great for getting those job offers.
From an employer's standpoint, that's an awful statement to read. If I
hire a certified perl/mod_perl person, I'd like to believe that they're
with my company, and not reviewing other job offers continually, if
the site could evolve to "available certified folks"... that would
be a much better solution. See point #1 above.
Jay Jacobs
Re: [me too] certification [Was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]
Posted by Matt Sergeant <ma...@sergeant.org>.
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Paul wrote:
> I would love to be able to list on my resumé that I was Perl and
> mod_perl certified. How about publicity in the form of a page listing
> certified Perl/modPerl coders on take23, with contact info if they
> like? Great for getting those job offers.
We will be doing jobs and resumes on there when I get some tuits to do a
bit more coding on the site, maybe over xmas. What I'd love to be able to
provide is some sort of auto-matcher for employers/employees, but thats
way up there right now.
--
<Matt/>
/|| ** Director and CTO **
//|| ** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
// || ** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
// \\| // ** Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/ **
\\//
//\\
// \\