You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> on 2023/04/10 20:53:07 UTC

[VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Hey everyone!

I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail
the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the Clients>

Please refer to the discussion thread here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s

Thanks!
P

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by José Armando García Sancio <js...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
Thanks for the KIP Philip.

+1 binding.

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 9:55 AM Philip Nee <pn...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> Thanks all.  Will find time to get the patch out.
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:42 AM Federico Valeri <fe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18 AM Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Philip,
> > >
> > > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:52 PM Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the vote.  We've decided to make a minor change to the
> > default
> > > > timeout from 5min to 2min.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot <da...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip!
> > > > >
> > > > > Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio
> > > > > <js...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
> > > > > > <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 Thanks Philip!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <philipnee@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey everyone!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures
> > Should
> > > > Not
> > > > > > Fail
> > > > > > > > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail
> > the
> > > > > > Clients>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > > > > > > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > P
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > -José
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >



-- 
-José

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by Philip Nee <pn...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
Thanks all.  Will find time to get the patch out.

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:42 AM Federico Valeri <fe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18 AM Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Philip,
> >
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajini
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:52 PM Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the vote.  We've decided to make a minor change to the
> default
> > > timeout from 5min to 2min.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip!
> > > >
> > > > Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio
> > > > <js...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
> > > > > <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 Thanks Philip!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <philipnee@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey everyone!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures
> Should
> > > Not
> > > > > Fail
> > > > > > > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail
> the
> > > > > Clients>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > P
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -José
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by Federico Valeri <fe...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding)
Thanks

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18 AM Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:52 PM Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the vote.  We've decided to make a minor change to the default
> > timeout from 5min to 2min.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip!
> > >
> > > Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio
> > > <js...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
> > > > <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 Thanks Philip!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey everyone!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should
> > Not
> > > > Fail
> > > > > > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the
> > > > Clients>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > P
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -José
> > > >
> > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Philip,

+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP!

Regards,

Rajini


On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:52 PM Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the vote.  We've decided to make a minor change to the default
> timeout from 5min to 2min.
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip!
> >
> > Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio
> > <js...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :
> >
> > > +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
> > > <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 Thanks Philip!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey everyone!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should
> Not
> > > Fail
> > > > > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the
> > > Clients>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > P
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -José
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the vote.  We've decided to make a minor change to the default
timeout from 5min to 2min.

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM David Jacot <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip!
>
> Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio
> <js...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :
>
> > +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
> > <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 Thanks Philip!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey everyone!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not
> > Fail
> > > > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the
> > Clients>
> > > > >
> > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > P
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -José
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by David Jacot <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Philip!

Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 20:23, José Armando García Sancio
<js...@confluent.io.invalid> a écrit :

> +1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
> <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > +1 Thanks Philip!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey everyone!
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not
> Fail
> > > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the
> Clients>
> > > >
> > > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > P
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> -José
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by José Armando García Sancio <js...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
+1. Thanks for the design. Looking forward to the implementation.

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Gustafson
<ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1 Thanks Philip!
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey everyone!
> > >
> > > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail
> > > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the Clients>
> > >
> > > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > P
> >
> >



-- 
-José

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
+1 Thanks Philip!


On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone!
> >
> > I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail
> > the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the Clients>
> >
> > Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> >
> > Thanks!
> > P
>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail the Client

Posted by Kirk True <ki...@kirktrue.pro>.
+1 (non-binding)

> On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nee <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey everyone!
> 
> I'm starting a vote for KIP-909: DNS Resolution Fallures Should Not Fail
> the Client <http://DNS Resolution Failure Should Not Fail the Clients>
> 
> Please refer to the discussion thread here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/st84zzwnq5m3pkzd1r7jk9lmqdt9m98s
> 
> Thanks!
> P