You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shiro.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2008/10/08 05:53:58 UTC

v0.9 release

Any ideas on when this will occur?


Regards,
Alan


Re: v0.9 release

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Les Hazlewood wrote:
> That's a good point.
>
> I guess maybe a better approach is to make a release now (0.9-RC3) -
> today or tomorrow - and then do the code import into the ASF repo and
> finish the JavaDoc there?
>   
+1

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Re: v0.9 release

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Les Hazlewood wrote:
> I wanted to get this done before today, but I'm on a business trip at
> the moment.  When I get back (Monday), I'll probably have time to do
> it Tuesday.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Les
>   
Hi Les,

obviously, you didn't had time last week. Any chance this can be done asap ?

Thanks !

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Re: v0.9 release

Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
I wanted to get this done before today, but I'm on a business trip at
the moment.  When I get back (Monday), I'll probably have time to do
it Tuesday.

Cheers,

Les

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> How is this going?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
>> That's a good point.
>>
>> I guess maybe a better approach is to make a release now (0.9-RC3) -
>> today or tomorrow - and then do the code import into the ASF repo and
>> finish the JavaDoc there?
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The only thing left is JavaDoc, and I've already indicated everywhere
>>>> in code this needs to occur via //TODO tags.  If anyone is able to
>>>> help whittle down those TODOs, it would be much appreciated.  As soon
>>>> as they're all gone, the release can be made.
>>>>
>>>
>>> At this point, if you have added TODOs all over the places where the
>>> Javadoc
>>> is missing, I think that we can inject the code into Apache subversion :
>>> you
>>> may find peeps at apache who _love_ to add javadoc ;)
>>>
>>> Seriously, perfection is not something we can reach. It's only a moving
>>> target. I would rather have the code base available, so that we can start
>>> building the community around JSecurity, because this is the most
>>> difficult
>>> task to complete to get JSecurity out of the incubator.
>>>
>>> Of course, IMHO.
>>>
>>> Thanks Les !
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> cordialement, regards,
>>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>>> www.iktek.com
>>> directory.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Re: v0.9 release

Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
How is this going?


Regards,
Alan

On Oct 8, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

> That's a good point.
>
> I guess maybe a better approach is to make a release now (0.9-RC3) -
> today or tomorrow - and then do the code import into the ASF repo and
> finish the JavaDoc there?
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>> Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>
>>> The only thing left is JavaDoc, and I've already indicated  
>>> everywhere
>>> in code this needs to occur via //TODO tags.  If anyone is able to
>>> help whittle down those TODOs, it would be much appreciated.  As  
>>> soon
>>> as they're all gone, the release can be made.
>>>
>>
>> At this point, if you have added TODOs all over the places where  
>> the Javadoc
>> is missing, I think that we can inject the code into Apache  
>> subversion : you
>> may find peeps at apache who _love_ to add javadoc ;)
>>
>> Seriously, perfection is not something we can reach. It's only a  
>> moving
>> target. I would rather have the code base available, so that we can  
>> start
>> building the community around JSecurity, because this is the most  
>> difficult
>> task to complete to get JSecurity out of the incubator.
>>
>> Of course, IMHO.
>>
>> Thanks Les !
>>
>> --
>> --
>> cordialement, regards,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.iktek.com
>> directory.apache.org
>>
>>
>>


Re: v0.9 release

Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
That's a good point.

I guess maybe a better approach is to make a release now (0.9-RC3) -
today or tomorrow - and then do the code import into the ASF repo and
finish the JavaDoc there?

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>> The only thing left is JavaDoc, and I've already indicated everywhere
>> in code this needs to occur via //TODO tags.  If anyone is able to
>> help whittle down those TODOs, it would be much appreciated.  As soon
>> as they're all gone, the release can be made.
>>
>
> At this point, if you have added TODOs all over the places where the Javadoc
> is missing, I think that we can inject the code into Apache subversion : you
> may find peeps at apache who _love_ to add javadoc ;)
>
> Seriously, perfection is not something we can reach. It's only a moving
> target. I would rather have the code base available, so that we can start
> building the community around JSecurity, because this is the most difficult
> task to complete to get JSecurity out of the incubator.
>
> Of course, IMHO.
>
> Thanks Les !
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>

Re: v0.9 release

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Les Hazlewood wrote:
> The only thing left is JavaDoc, and I've already indicated everywhere
> in code this needs to occur via //TODO tags.  If anyone is able to
> help whittle down those TODOs, it would be much appreciated.  As soon
> as they're all gone, the release can be made.
>   
At this point, if you have added TODOs all over the places where the 
Javadoc is missing, I think that we can inject the code into Apache 
subversion : you may find peeps at apache who _love_ to add javadoc ;)

Seriously, perfection is not something we can reach. It's only a moving 
target. I would rather have the code base available, so that we can 
start building the community around JSecurity, because this is the most 
difficult task to complete to get JSecurity out of the incubator.

Of course, IMHO.

Thanks Les !

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Re: v0.9 release

Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
The only thing left is JavaDoc, and I've already indicated everywhere
in code this needs to occur via //TODO tags.  If anyone is able to
help whittle down those TODOs, it would be much appreciated.  As soon
as they're all gone, the release can be made.

Otherwise, I'm updating them as I have time.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Any ideas on when this will occur?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>