Difference between Virtual Topic and Composite Queue

[LiXiao2007 <Li...@gmail.com>]

I would like to send messages to a central point where JMS will automatically
forward them to a set of queues for different systems. It seems to me that
both Virutal topic and composite queue can accomplish this. Between virtual
topic and composite queue, which one will do the better job. What is their
main difference?
Thanks!
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Difference-between-Virtual-Topic-and-Composite-Queue-tf3297753s2354.html#a9173989
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Difference between Virtual Topic and Composite Queue

[James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>]

On 2/27/07, LiXiao2007 <Li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to send messages to a central point where JMS will automatically
> forward them to a set of queues for different systems. It seems to me that
> both Virutal topic and composite queue can accomplish this. Between virtual
> topic and composite queue, which one will do the better job. What is their
> main difference?

Here's a new FAQ entry on that (which will appear on the main site in
an hour or so)
http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/what-is-the-difference-between-a-virtual-topic-and-a-composite-destination.html
-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/