You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@gora.apache.org by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> on 2011/02/01 08:13:46 UTC
Should the Current Gora version is 0.1-incubating instead of 0.1?
I saw in the build.xml and build-common.xml the version value is 0.1.
Should this be 0.1-incubating instead?
Once 0.1-incubating is released, should this be changed to
0.2-incubating in the trunk?
--
Thanks,
Henry
Re: Should the Current Gora version is 0.1-incubating instead of
0.1?
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1, the version should be 0.1-incubating.
Thanks guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 31, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe the only restriction about versioning to include -incubation
> suffix is when the code is released. But for consistency, it is a very good
> idea to change the version to 0.1-incubating.
>
> And yes, since after the branch, we need to rename trunk version to
> 0.2-incubating.
>
> Enis
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I saw in the build.xml and build-common.xml the version value is 0.1.
>> Should this be 0.1-incubating instead?
>>
>> Once 0.1-incubating is released, should this be changed to
>> 0.2-incubating in the trunk?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Henry
>>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: Should the Current Gora version is 0.1-incubating instead of 0.1?
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I believe the only restriction about versioning to include -incubation
suffix is when the code is released. But for consistency, it is a very good
idea to change the version to 0.1-incubating.
And yes, since after the branch, we need to rename trunk version to
0.2-incubating.
Enis
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I saw in the build.xml and build-common.xml the version value is 0.1.
> Should this be 0.1-incubating instead?
>
> Once 0.1-incubating is released, should this be changed to
> 0.2-incubating in the trunk?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Henry
>