STDCXX voting summary

[Heidi Buelow <he...@roguewave.com>]

Hi everyone,

It looks like the STDCXX incubator project proposal has been accepted.  Here
is a summary of the votes.

Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding)
Neutral (1): Jim (binding)
Negative ()

I will send mailing list and web page details as soon as they are ready.

We also have received messages from a few people in the community who want
to work on the project.  We welcome you all and will soon be ready for
actual coding.  Watch for the first code drop to start.

I want to thank our mentors, Justin Erenkrantz and Ben Laurie, for their
help in getting us this far.

It's officially incubating.  

Heidi.
--------------------
Heidi Buelow
Rogue Wave, a division of Quovadx


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: STDCXX voting summary

[Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>]

--On Friday, May 20, 2005 9:58 AM -0700 Cliff Schmidt <cl...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> I also didn't vote, but would vote +1.  Maybe I'm too much of a
> stickler for process, but I was waiting for a [VOTE] email to
> follow-up on the "Proposal" thread.  Although I realize it's not
> uncommon for a proposal thread to end up looking a lot like a bunch of
> votes.

The proposals I've seen on list recently (i.e. Harmony) had replies with votes 
to the initial proposal.  This is also the way dev@httpd works: people post a 
proposal and then people reply with votes to that proposal.  There is usually 
no 'Vote' thread (unless for some reason it is *really* contentious which has 
probably happened once since I've been there).

I view the explicit 'tally' email as the only real requirement to ensure that 
no one has their votes miscounted and that a sufficient quorum exists to 
proceed.  IMHO, an explicitly separate 'Vote' thread is overkill and serves no 
real purpose.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: STDCXX voting summary

[David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>]

Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> I also didn't vote, but would vote +1.  Maybe I'm too much of a
> stickler for process, but I was waiting for a [VOTE] email to
> follow-up on the "Proposal" thread.  Although I realize it's not
> uncommon for a proposal thread to end up looking a lot like a bunch of
> votes.

Keep on Cliff. I too try to urge that people don't
vote inside another thread. It all becomes so confusing.

--David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: STDCXX voting summary

[Cliff Schmidt <cl...@gmail.com>]

I also didn't vote, but would vote +1.  Maybe I'm too much of a
stickler for process, but I was waiting for a [VOTE] email to
follow-up on the "Proposal" thread.  Although I realize it's not
uncommon for a proposal thread to end up looking a lot like a bunch of
votes.

Cliff

On 5/19/05, Heidi Buelow <he...@roguewave.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> It looks like the STDCXX incubator project proposal has been accepted.  Here
> is a summary of the votes.
> 
> Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding)
> Neutral (1): Jim (binding)
> Negative ()
> 
> I will send mailing list and web page details as soon as they are ready.
> 
> We also have received messages from a few people in the community who want
> to work on the project.  We welcome you all and will soon be ready for
> actual coding.  Watch for the first code drop to start.
> 
> I want to thank our mentors, Justin Erenkrantz and Ben Laurie, for their
> help in getting us this far.
> 
> It's officially incubating.
> 
> Heidi.
> --------------------
> Heidi Buelow
> Rogue Wave, a division of Quovadx
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: STDCXX voting summary

[Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>]

I didn't vote either but +1 from me too. Axis/C++ stuff had lots of
portability problems with STL a while back and having our portable impl
would've made a big diff.

Sanjiva.

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 09:36 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> > On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <he...@roguewave.com> wrote:
> > 
> >>Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding)
> >>Neutral (1): Jim (binding)
> >>Negative ()
> > 
> > 
> > For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My
> > vote would be +0.
> 
> And I vote +1 (I expected that to be implied by my offer to mentor!)
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: STDCXX voting summary

[Ben Laurie <be...@algroup.co.uk>]

Leo Simons wrote:
> On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <he...@roguewave.com> wrote:
> 
>>Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding)
>>Neutral (1): Jim (binding)
>>Negative ()
> 
> 
> For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My
> vote would be +0.

And I vote +1 (I expected that to be implied by my offer to mentor!)

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: STDCXX voting summary

[Leo Simons <ma...@leosimons.com>]

On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <he...@roguewave.com> wrote:
> Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding)
> Neutral (1): Jim (binding)
> Negative ()

For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My
vote would be +0.

Cheers!

- Leo




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org