You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Beniamin Mazan <it...@mazan.pl> on 2008/07/07 14:07:02 UTC
Could I use Hibernate as default persistence engine with Geronimo
2.1?
-----
thanks
Beniamin
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Could-I-use-Hibernate-as-default-persistence-engine-with-Geronimo-2.1--tp18315223s134p18315223.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Could I use Hibernate as default persistence engine with
Geronimo 2.1?
Posted by Beniamin Mazan <it...@mazan.pl>.
I reconfigured my persistence.xml, add some deps to openejb-jar.xml and put
all necessary libs to repository and get.... exception like that one
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?p=2310316&
cause of using 1) List to store collection on elements, and 2) eager
loading.
So, for the moment, I'll stay with OpenJPA.
-----
thanks
Beniamin
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Could-I-use-Hibernate-as-default-persistence-engine-with-Geronimo-2.1--tp18315223s134p18319170.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Could I use Hibernate as default persistence engine with
Geronimo 2.1?
Posted by Beniamin Mazan <it...@mazan.pl>.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Beniamin Mazan <it...@mazan.pl> wrote:
>
> Please copy/paste the subject at the very least so there's anything to
> respond to. Care to negotiate? ;-)
>
> I haven't seen anybody who has tried to change OpenJPA (the default
> JPA engine in Geronimo) to Hibernate as a default JPA provider, but
> Hibernate works fine when specified in provider in persistence.xml.
> The only drawback of specyfing it in the aforementioned file
> is...well...having to specify it explicitly. Not much, but could be
> less of course. I think it'd be a good exercise to find out how much
> effort changing OpenJPA to Hibernate would require. Perhaps not an
> easy task but definitely doable.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
>
Thanks Jacek, I'll try to use H in the way you described. I've found too
much cases of strange behaviour of OpenJPA.
-----
thanks
Beniamin
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Could-I-use-Hibernate-as-default-persistence-engine-with-Geronimo-2.1--tp18315223s134p18317334.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Could I use Hibernate as default persistence engine with Geronimo 2.1?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Beniamin Mazan <it...@mazan.pl> wrote:
Please copy/paste the subject at the very least so there's anything to
respond to. Care to negotiate? ;-)
I haven't seen anybody who has tried to change OpenJPA (the default
JPA engine in Geronimo) to Hibernate as a default JPA provider, but
Hibernate works fine when specified in provider in persistence.xml.
The only drawback of specyfing it in the aforementioned file
is...well...having to specify it explicitly. Not much, but could be
less of course. I think it'd be a good exercise to find out how much
effort changing OpenJPA to Hibernate would require. Perhaps not an
easy task but definitely doable.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl