You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to test-dev@httpd.apache.org by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com> on 2001/12/05 22:47:51 UTC
New perl-framework failures
Now I'm getting this on Linux (RH 5.2 with Perl 5.6.1):
http11/basicauth....Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at http11/basicauth.t line 28.
dubious
Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED test 3
Failed 1/3 tests, 66.67% okay
http11/chunked......Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at http11/chunked.t line 50.
dubious
Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED tests 2, 5-30
Failed 27/30 tests, 10.00% okay
I'm *not* seeing these on more recent Linux versions (also
with Perl 5.6.*)..
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
* On 2001-12-06 at 18:43,
Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@golux.com> excited the electrons to say:
>
> Eh. So why am I not seeing Client-Request-Num in the LWP
> output? Rrrr...
Hmm.. maybe because 'User-Agent: lwp-request/1.37' instead of 1.40?
Which is what I get on another system where this *doesn't* fail?
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net>.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Eh. So why am I not seeing Client-Request-Num in the LWP
> output? Rrrr...
because your are using lwp 5.62?
the change was actually made in 5.61, from Changes:
"- Client-Request-Num renamed to Client-Response-Num"
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
* On 2001-12-06 at 18:35,
Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net> excited the electrons to say:
>
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > Client-Response-Num: 3
> ...
> > my $request_num = $res->header('Client-Request-Num');
> ...
> > Was that supposed to be 'Client-Response-Num' instead of 'Request'?
>
> no, that's correct for lwp 5.60. i just made a change so both versions
> are supported.
Eh. So why am I not seeing Client-Request-Num in the LWP
output? Rrrr...
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net>.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Client-Response-Num: 3
...
> my $request_num = $res->header('Client-Request-Num');
...
> Was that supposed to be 'Client-Response-Num' instead of 'Request'?
no, that's correct for lwp 5.60. i just made a change so both versions
are supported.
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> if >= 5.60 output of t/TEST -d lwp t/http11/basicauth.t
> would be useful.
No real joy:
http11/basicauth....1..3
GET http://localhost:8529/authany/index.html:
User-Agent: libwww-perl/5.62
HTTP/1.1 401 (Unauthorized) Authorization Required
Connection: Keep-Alive
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 21:32:59 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.30-dev (Unix)
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="authany"
Content-Length: 401
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Client-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 21:33:02 GMT
Client-Response-Num: 1
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100
Title: 401 Authorization Required
ok 1
GET http://localhost:8529/authany/index.html:
Authorization: Basic Z3Vlc3Q6Z3Vlc3Q=
User-Agent: libwww-perl/5.62
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 21:33:05 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "11ef7-1a-d1ed2e80"
Server: Apache/2.0.30-dev (Unix)
Content-Length: 26
Content-Type: text/html
Last-Modified: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:37:14 GMT
Client-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 21:33:05 GMT
Client-Response-Num: 3
ok 2
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at http11/basicauth.t line 28.
dubious
Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED test 3
Failed 1/3 tests, 66.67% okay
Lines 26-28 is:
my $request_num = $res->header('Client-Request-Num');
ok $request_num == 3;
Was that supposed to be 'Client-Response-Num' instead of 'Request'?
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> what version of LWP?
5.62
> if >= 5.60 output of t/TEST -d lwp t/http11/basicauth.t
> would be useful.
Working on it..
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: New perl-framework failures
Posted by Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net>.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Now I'm getting this on Linux (RH 5.2 with Perl 5.6.1):
...
> I'm *not* seeing these on more recent Linux versions (also
> with Perl 5.6.*)..
what version of LWP? those tests should be skipped unless >= 5.60
if >= 5.60 output of t/TEST -d lwp t/http11/basicauth.t
would be useful.