You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2019/05/20 11:09:34 UTC

svn commit: r1859549 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Author: rpluem
Date: Mon May 20 11:09:34 2019
New Revision: 1859549

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1859549&view=rev
Log:
* Vote

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1859549&r1=1859548&r2=1859549&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon May 20 11:09:34 2019
@@ -278,10 +278,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1859371
                   http://svn.apache.org/r1859422
      2.4.x patch: http://home.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-2.4.x-proxy-ssl-proxy-section-r1859371-r1859422.patch
-     +1: rjung
+     +1: rjung, rpluem
      -1: 
-     rpluem says: I would prefer adding r1859422 to this backport proposal to
-                  have the issue fixed for other proxy modules as well.
      rjung: I added r1859422 now. I had the plan to add the second backports
             separately, but I am totally fine to combine them.