You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> on 2019/10/01 00:41:42 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0
+1 for Java 8
it's time now and we will probably having more contributions as young/cool
kids prefer using modern tools
Yup the world is not only made with Old Grumpy grand dad working only with
Java 5 :P )
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 04:14, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> The versions upgrades of plugins are part of another topic, which are
> indeed 3.7.0 candidates.
>
> As said, the Java 8 update is not just about internal code improvements
> or
> changes. Maven will expose new APIs/SPIs that contain Java 8 Functions,
> so
> it must be seen as a requirement to implement the experimental
> buildconsumer feature.
>
> Robert
>
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:23:16 +0200, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > For the user community these two issues are important:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6169
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6548
> > The Tycho project is the user as well.
> > The J8 is internal code improvement/change => lower priority than the
> > user's priority => release order/priorities/dedicated time spent in
> > development.
> >
> > Have a nice day.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Tibor17
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:08 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I would say that fixing the Tycho issue comes first.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:04 AM Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > TLDR; introduce maven.experimental.buildconsumer and push Java
> >> > requirement
> >> > to Java 8
> >> >
> >> > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems like we
> >> > didn't
> >> > face real regressions.
> >> > The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
> >> >
> >> > However, I think we're ready to push Maven to the next level.
> >> >
> >> > For those actively reading this list, they should recognize the need
> >> for
> >> > splitting up the pom as it is on the local system versus the pom being
> >> > uploaded. Once we truly control this mechanism we can think of
> >> > improvements on model 5.0.0 and new fileformats.
> >> >
> >> > I've created and implemented MNG-6656[1]. It also contains a zip
> with
> >> an
> >> > example (original, patched, README) to understand what's happening.
> >> >
> >> > In order to make this successful, we need IDEs and CI Servers to
> >> > understand and support these changes. The likely need to implement
> >> one of
> >> > the interfaces[2].
> >> > The new interface uses Java8 Functions (and especially
> >> SAXEventFactory is
> >> > way easier to read+maintain with Java 8). I've tried to keep Maven
> >> Java 7
> >> > compatible, but that was too hard to do.
> >> > So I'd like to use this opportunity to move Maven forward and start
> >> > requiring Java 8.
> >> >
> >> > There are some other improvements I'd like to add (those messages will
> >> > follow), so this will imply that it will take some time before we do a
> >> > new
> >> > release.
> >> >
> >> > WDTY,
> >> > Robert
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6656?expand=1
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
+1 on Java 8 requirement for Maven runtime (note this still lets you
compile with Java 7 if you are prepared to use toolchains... the complexity
of using toolchains is an argument for improving/revisiting toolchains)
+1 on getting the place for filtering the pom.xml to produce the consumer
pom.xml, but I would go one step further. Enable it by default, but allow
opt-out. Also I would suggest to pick up a feature-flagging technique to
allow a project to opt out just by declaring the `maven.experimental.___`
property in the `pom.xml`. We should be clear that such flags will stop
working once the feature is confirmed solid, but NOBODY will turn the
experimental flag on, especially if it is a system property only flag...
and if we do not have confidence that the feature will work with both the
shade plugin and the gpg plugin then - quite frankly - the feature is not
ready
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 18:31, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/286
>
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 13:49:25 +0200, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>
> wrote:
>
> > Robert,
> > Can you create a PR?
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il mar 1 ott 2019, 07:19 Sylwester Lachiewicz <sl...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> >> +1 for Java 8 - let's kill 7 faster ;-))
> >>
> >> Sylwester
> >>
> >> wt., 1 paź 2019, 02:41 użytkownik Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
> >> napisał:
> >>
> >> > +1 for Java 8
> >> > it's time now and we will probably having more contributions as
> >> young/cool
> >> > kids prefer using modern tools
> >> > Yup the world is not only made with Old Grumpy grand dad working only
> >> with
> >> > Java 5 :P )
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 04:14, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > The versions upgrades of plugins are part of another topic, which
> >> are
> >> > > indeed 3.7.0 candidates.
> >> > >
> >> > > As said, the Java 8 update is not just about internal code
> >> improvements
> >> > > or
> >> > > changes. Maven will expose new APIs/SPIs that contain Java 8
> >> Functions,
> >> > > so
> >> > > it must be seen as a requirement to implement the experimental
> >> > > buildconsumer feature.
> >> > >
> >> > > Robert
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:23:16 +0200, Tibor Digana <
> >> tibordigana@apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hello guys,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > For the user community these two issues are important:
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6169
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6548
> >> > > > The Tycho project is the user as well.
> >> > > > The J8 is internal code improvement/change => lower priority
> than
> >> the
> >> > > > user's priority => release order/priorities/dedicated time spent
> >> in
> >> > > > development.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Have a nice day.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers
> >> > > > Tibor17
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:08 PM Gary Gregory
> >> <garydgregory@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> I would say that fixing the Tycho issue comes first.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Gary
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:04 AM Robert Scholte <
> >> rfscholte@apache.org>
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > Hi,
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > TLDR; introduce maven.experimental.buildconsumer and push Java
> >> > > >> > requirement
> >> > > >> > to Java 8
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems
> >> like
> >> we
> >> > > >> > didn't
> >> > > >> > face real regressions.
> >> > > >> > The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > However, I think we're ready to push Maven to the next level.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > For those actively reading this list, they should recognize the
> >> need
> >> > > >> for
> >> > > >> > splitting up the pom as it is on the local system versus the
> >> pom
> >> > being
> >> > > >> > uploaded. Once we truly control this mechanism we can think of
> >> > > >> > improvements on model 5.0.0 and new fileformats.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > I've created and implemented MNG-6656[1]. It also contains a
> >> zip
> >> > > with
> >> > > >> an
> >> > > >> > example (original, patched, README) to understand what's
> >> happening.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > In order to make this successful, we need IDEs and CI Servers
> >> to
> >> > > >> > understand and support these changes. The likely need to
> >> implement
> >> > > >> one of
> >> > > >> > the interfaces[2].
> >> > > >> > The new interface uses Java8 Functions (and especially
> >> > > >> SAXEventFactory is
> >> > > >> > way easier to read+maintain with Java 8). I've tried to keep
> >> Maven
> >> > > >> Java 7
> >> > > >> > compatible, but that was too hard to do.
> >> > > >> > So I'd like to use this opportunity to move Maven forward and
> >> start
> >> > > >> > requiring Java 8.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > There are some other improvements I'd like to add (those
> >> messages
> >> > will
> >> > > >> > follow), so this will imply that it will take some time
> before
> >> we
> >> > do a
> >> > > >> > new
> >> > > >> > release.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > WDTY,
> >> > > >> > Robert
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
> >> > > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6656?expand=1
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Olivier Lamy
> >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0
Posted by Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>.
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/286
On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 13:49:25 +0200, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Robert,
> Can you create a PR?
>
> Enrico
>
> Il mar 1 ott 2019, 07:19 Sylwester Lachiewicz <sl...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> +1 for Java 8 - let's kill 7 faster ;-))
>>
>> Sylwester
>>
>> wt., 1 paź 2019, 02:41 użytkownik Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>> napisał:
>>
>> > +1 for Java 8
>> > it's time now and we will probably having more contributions as
>> young/cool
>> > kids prefer using modern tools
>> > Yup the world is not only made with Old Grumpy grand dad working only
>> with
>> > Java 5 :P )
>> >
>> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 04:14, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The versions upgrades of plugins are part of another topic, which
>> are
>> > > indeed 3.7.0 candidates.
>> > >
>> > > As said, the Java 8 update is not just about internal code
>> improvements
>> > > or
>> > > changes. Maven will expose new APIs/SPIs that contain Java 8
>> Functions,
>> > > so
>> > > it must be seen as a requirement to implement the experimental
>> > > buildconsumer feature.
>> > >
>> > > Robert
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:23:16 +0200, Tibor Digana <
>> tibordigana@apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello guys,
>> > > >
>> > > > For the user community these two issues are important:
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6169
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6548
>> > > > The Tycho project is the user as well.
>> > > > The J8 is internal code improvement/change => lower priority than
>> the
>> > > > user's priority => release order/priorities/dedicated time spent
>> in
>> > > > development.
>> > > >
>> > > > Have a nice day.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers
>> > > > Tibor17
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:08 PM Gary Gregory
>> <garydgregory@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I would say that fixing the Tycho issue comes first.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Gary
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:04 AM Robert Scholte <
>> rfscholte@apache.org>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Hi,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > TLDR; introduce maven.experimental.buildconsumer and push Java
>> > > >> > requirement
>> > > >> > to Java 8
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems
>> like
>> we
>> > > >> > didn't
>> > > >> > face real regressions.
>> > > >> > The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > However, I think we're ready to push Maven to the next level.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > For those actively reading this list, they should recognize the
>> need
>> > > >> for
>> > > >> > splitting up the pom as it is on the local system versus the
>> pom
>> > being
>> > > >> > uploaded. Once we truly control this mechanism we can think of
>> > > >> > improvements on model 5.0.0 and new fileformats.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I've created and implemented MNG-6656[1]. It also contains a
>> zip
>> > > with
>> > > >> an
>> > > >> > example (original, patched, README) to understand what's
>> happening.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > In order to make this successful, we need IDEs and CI Servers
>> to
>> > > >> > understand and support these changes. The likely need to
>> implement
>> > > >> one of
>> > > >> > the interfaces[2].
>> > > >> > The new interface uses Java8 Functions (and especially
>> > > >> SAXEventFactory is
>> > > >> > way easier to read+maintain with Java 8). I've tried to keep
>> Maven
>> > > >> Java 7
>> > > >> > compatible, but that was too hard to do.
>> > > >> > So I'd like to use this opportunity to move Maven forward and
>> start
>> > > >> > requiring Java 8.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > There are some other improvements I'd like to add (those
>> messages
>> > will
>> > > >> > follow), so this will imply that it will take some time before
>> we
>> > do a
>> > > >> > new
>> > > >> > release.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > WDTY,
>> > > >> > Robert
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
>> > > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6656?expand=1
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Olivier Lamy
>> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Robert,
Can you create a PR?
Enrico
Il mar 1 ott 2019, 07:19 Sylwester Lachiewicz <sl...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> +1 for Java 8 - let's kill 7 faster ;-))
>
> Sylwester
>
> wt., 1 paź 2019, 02:41 użytkownik Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> napisał:
>
> > +1 for Java 8
> > it's time now and we will probably having more contributions as
> young/cool
> > kids prefer using modern tools
> > Yup the world is not only made with Old Grumpy grand dad working only
> with
> > Java 5 :P )
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 04:14, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The versions upgrades of plugins are part of another topic, which are
> > > indeed 3.7.0 candidates.
> > >
> > > As said, the Java 8 update is not just about internal code improvements
> > > or
> > > changes. Maven will expose new APIs/SPIs that contain Java 8 Functions,
> > > so
> > > it must be seen as a requirement to implement the experimental
> > > buildconsumer feature.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:23:16 +0200, Tibor Digana <
> tibordigana@apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello guys,
> > > >
> > > > For the user community these two issues are important:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6169
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6548
> > > > The Tycho project is the user as well.
> > > > The J8 is internal code improvement/change => lower priority than the
> > > > user's priority => release order/priorities/dedicated time spent in
> > > > development.
> > > >
> > > > Have a nice day.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Tibor17
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:08 PM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I would say that fixing the Tycho issue comes first.
> > > >>
> > > >> Gary
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:04 AM Robert Scholte <
> rfscholte@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > TLDR; introduce maven.experimental.buildconsumer and push Java
> > > >> > requirement
> > > >> > to Java 8
> > > >> >
> > > >> > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems like
> we
> > > >> > didn't
> > > >> > face real regressions.
> > > >> > The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > However, I think we're ready to push Maven to the next level.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > For those actively reading this list, they should recognize the
> need
> > > >> for
> > > >> > splitting up the pom as it is on the local system versus the pom
> > being
> > > >> > uploaded. Once we truly control this mechanism we can think of
> > > >> > improvements on model 5.0.0 and new fileformats.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've created and implemented MNG-6656[1]. It also contains a zip
> > > with
> > > >> an
> > > >> > example (original, patched, README) to understand what's
> happening.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In order to make this successful, we need IDEs and CI Servers to
> > > >> > understand and support these changes. The likely need to implement
> > > >> one of
> > > >> > the interfaces[2].
> > > >> > The new interface uses Java8 Functions (and especially
> > > >> SAXEventFactory is
> > > >> > way easier to read+maintain with Java 8). I've tried to keep Maven
> > > >> Java 7
> > > >> > compatible, but that was too hard to do.
> > > >> > So I'd like to use this opportunity to move Maven forward and
> start
> > > >> > requiring Java 8.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > There are some other improvements I'd like to add (those messages
> > will
> > > >> > follow), so this will imply that it will take some time before we
> > do a
> > > >> > new
> > > >> > release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > WDTY,
> > > >> > Robert
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
> > > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6656?expand=1
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Olivier Lamy
> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0
Posted by Sylwester Lachiewicz <sl...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Java 8 - let's kill 7 faster ;-))
Sylwester
wt., 1 paź 2019, 02:41 użytkownik Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> napisał:
> +1 for Java 8
> it's time now and we will probably having more contributions as young/cool
> kids prefer using modern tools
> Yup the world is not only made with Old Grumpy grand dad working only with
> Java 5 :P )
>
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 04:14, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > The versions upgrades of plugins are part of another topic, which are
> > indeed 3.7.0 candidates.
> >
> > As said, the Java 8 update is not just about internal code improvements
> > or
> > changes. Maven will expose new APIs/SPIs that contain Java 8 Functions,
> > so
> > it must be seen as a requirement to implement the experimental
> > buildconsumer feature.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:23:16 +0200, Tibor Digana <tibordigana@apache.org
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > For the user community these two issues are important:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6169
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6548
> > > The Tycho project is the user as well.
> > > The J8 is internal code improvement/change => lower priority than the
> > > user's priority => release order/priorities/dedicated time spent in
> > > development.
> > >
> > > Have a nice day.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Tibor17
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:08 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I would say that fixing the Tycho issue comes first.
> > >>
> > >> Gary
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:04 AM Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > TLDR; introduce maven.experimental.buildconsumer and push Java
> > >> > requirement
> > >> > to Java 8
> > >> >
> > >> > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems like we
> > >> > didn't
> > >> > face real regressions.
> > >> > The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
> > >> >
> > >> > However, I think we're ready to push Maven to the next level.
> > >> >
> > >> > For those actively reading this list, they should recognize the need
> > >> for
> > >> > splitting up the pom as it is on the local system versus the pom
> being
> > >> > uploaded. Once we truly control this mechanism we can think of
> > >> > improvements on model 5.0.0 and new fileformats.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've created and implemented MNG-6656[1]. It also contains a zip
> > with
> > >> an
> > >> > example (original, patched, README) to understand what's happening.
> > >> >
> > >> > In order to make this successful, we need IDEs and CI Servers to
> > >> > understand and support these changes. The likely need to implement
> > >> one of
> > >> > the interfaces[2].
> > >> > The new interface uses Java8 Functions (and especially
> > >> SAXEventFactory is
> > >> > way easier to read+maintain with Java 8). I've tried to keep Maven
> > >> Java 7
> > >> > compatible, but that was too hard to do.
> > >> > So I'd like to use this opportunity to move Maven forward and start
> > >> > requiring Java 8.
> > >> >
> > >> > There are some other improvements I'd like to add (those messages
> will
> > >> > follow), so this will imply that it will take some time before we
> do a
> > >> > new
> > >> > release.
> > >> >
> > >> > WDTY,
> > >> > Robert
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
> > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6656?expand=1
> > >> >
> > >> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>