You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com> on 2008/04/04 06:13:50 UTC

Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Hi,anybody!
    I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise Myfaces/Jsf application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject? 
    The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
    Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the best architectures practise? 
    I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as JDBC,hibernate and others.
    Sorry for my poor english.
 
    btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsf implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation! Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in new version! Please.
 
 
    En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
_________________________________________________________________
新年换新颜,快来妆扮自己的MSN给心仪的TA一个惊喜!
http://im.live.cn/emoticons/?ID=18

Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:
>
>
> Yes, there are differences between Tomahawk, Trindad, Tobago, Orchestra and
> so on, but as a jsf implemenation user , I think that it's bad new that
> there are so many similar implemenations under a same place.  I think that

again... in Apache there is only ONE impl.
MyFaces CORE.
The other projects are independent! from the implementation.
They are:
-add-ons
-component libraries


> jsf circle must gather the power to implement one or two jsf implemenations.

well there are only two...

>
>  In my opinion, many choice is no choice!

Actually choice is good. That's how the "free market economy" works.

-Matthias


>
>  Sorry for my poor english, thanks all of you.
>
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>  Subject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application
> architectures
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:29:20 +0200
> From: alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com
>
>
> To: users@myfaces.apache.org
>
>
> Maybe you are mixing a few things.
>
> JSF implemenations are MyFaces-JSF (by Apache MyFaces) and Mojarra (by Sun)
>
> Tomahawk, Trindad and Tobago are Component Sets that sit on top of
> JSF-implementations
> (eg. Tomahawk works well also with Mojarra)
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  From: 周恩 [mailto:ejbstart@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application
> architectures
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> My main question is "Which is the best Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application
> architecture practise"? Let's discuss it more.
>
> I think that the advice to apache must be think better of:
>     Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsfimplements, now
> there are too many implements under Apache foundation! Tomahawk must keep
> updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in new version!
>
> I use JavaServer Faces from 2004 in real application, and I have write a
> rapid java development tool with myfaces. but which is the best practise is
> still puzzle me.
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:04:59 +0200
> > From: matzew@apache.org
> > To: users@myfaces.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application
> architectures
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org>
> wrote:> > Hi,
>
>
> > >
> > > cagatay has published a very nice example application called
> > > "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:
> > >
> > >
> http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25
> > >
> > > facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to
> > > study a real world jsf web application:
> > >
> > > http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies
> > >
> > > Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology
> > > stacks related to jsf.
> >
> > just a minor comment. FacesGoodi es uses Orchestra's extra scopes,
> > which I really strongly recommend to use.
> >
> > See:
> >
> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/
> >
> > -M
> >
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > Gerald> >
>
>
> > >
> > > 2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,anybody!
> > > > I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice
> Myfaces/Jsf
> > > > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise
> Myfaces/Jsf
> > > > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?
> > > > The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean
> > > > scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
> > > > Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the
> best
> > > &g t; architectures practise?
> > > > I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's
> > > > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as
> > > > JDBC,hibernate and others.
> > > > Sorry for my poor english.
> > > >
>  > > > btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two
> Jsf
> > > > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!
> > > > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and
> sanbox in
> > > > new version! Please.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, D evelopment and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > session s: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  Windows Live Writer,支持离线撰写博客内容,随时随地想写就写。 立即使用!
> ________________________________
> 使用新一代 Windows Live Messenger 轻松交流和共享! 立即体验!



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>.
Yes, there are differences between Tomahawk, Trindad, Tobago, Orchestra and so on, but as a jsf implemenation user , I think that it's bad new that there are so many similar implemenations under a same place.  I think that jsf circle must gather the power to implement one or two jsf implemenations. 
 
In my opinion, many choice is no choice!
 
Sorry for my poor english, thanks all of you.
 



Subject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architecturesDate: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:29:20 +0200From: alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.comTo: users@myfaces.apache.org



Maybe you are mixing a few things.
 
JSF implemenations are MyFaces-JSF (by Apache MyFaces) and Mojarra (by Sun)
 
Tomahawk, Trindad and Tobago are Component Sets that sit on top of JSF-implementations
(eg. Tomahawk works well also with Mojarra)
 
regards
Alexander



From: 周恩 [mailto:ejbstart@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:43 PMTo: MyFaces DiscussionSubject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures
Thanks a lot. My main question is "Which is the best Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture practise"? Let's discuss it more.  I think that the advice to apache must be think better of:    Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsfimplements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation! Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in new version!  I use JavaServer Faces from 2004 in real application, and I have write a rapid java development tool with myfaces. but which is the best practise is still puzzle me. > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:04:59 +0200> From: matzew@apache.org> To: users@myfaces.apache.org> Subject: Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org> wrote:> > Hi,> >> > cagatay has published a very nice example application called> > "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:> >> > http://c
 agataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25> >> > facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to> > study a real world jsf web application:> >> > http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies> >> > Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology> > stacks related to jsf.> > just a minor comment. FacesGoodi es uses Orchestra's extra scopes,> which I really strongly recommend to use.> > See:> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/> > -M> > >> > cheers,> >> > Gerald> >> >> > 2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:> >> >> > >> > > Hi,anybody!> > > I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice Myfaces/Jsf> > > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise Myfaces/Jsf> > > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?> > > The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean> > > scope and MVC'
 s controller implement strategy.> > > Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the best> > &g t; architectures practise?> > > I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's> > > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as> > > JDBC,hibernate and others.> > > Sorry for my poor english.> > >> > > btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsf> > > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!> > > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in> > > new version! Please.> > >> > >> > > En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04> > >> > > ________________________________> > > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!> >> >> >> > --> > http://www.irian.at> >> > Your JSF powerhouse -> > JSF Consulting, D evelopment and> > Courses in English and German> >> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf> > further stuff:> blog: http
 ://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Windows Live Writer,支持离线撰写博客内容,随时随地想写就写。 立即使用! 
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Photo gallery 数码相机的超级伴侣,轻松管理和编辑照片,还能制作全景美图!
http://get.live.cn/product/photo.html

RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by "Jesse Alexander (KSFH 323)" <al...@credit-suisse.com>.
Maybe you are mixing a few things.
 
JSF implemenations are MyFaces-JSF (by Apache MyFaces) and Mojarra (by Sun)
 
Tomahawk, Trindad and Tobago are Component Sets that sit on top of JSF-implementations
(eg. Tomahawk works well also with Mojarra)
 
regards
Alexander


________________________________

	From: 周恩 [mailto:ejbstart@hotmail.com] 
	Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:43 PM
	To: MyFaces Discussion
	Subject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures
	
	
	Thanks a lot.
	 
	My main question is "Which is the best Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture practise"? Let's discuss it more. 
	 
	I think that the advice to apache must be think better of:
	    Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsfimplements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation! Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in new version! 
	 
	I use JavaServer Faces from 2004 in real application, and I have write a rapid java development tool with myfaces. but which is the best practise is still puzzle me.
	 
	
	
	> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:04:59 +0200
	> From: matzew@apache.org
	> To: users@myfaces.apache.org
	> Subject: Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures
	> 
	> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org> wrote:
	> > Hi,
	> >
	> > cagatay has published a very nice example application called
	> > "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:
	> >
	> > http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25
	> >
	> > facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to
	> > study a real world jsf web application:
	> >
	> > http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies
	> >
	> > Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology
	> > stacks related to jsf.
	> 
	> just a minor comment. FacesGoodi es uses Orchestra's extra scopes,
	> which I really strongly recommend to use.
	> 
	> See:
	> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/
	> 
	> -M
	> 
	> >
	> > cheers,
	> >
	> > Gerald
	> >
	> >
	> > 2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:
	> >
	> >
	> > >
	> > > Hi,anybody!
	> > > I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice Myfaces/Jsf
	> > > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise Myfaces/Jsf
	> > > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?
	> > > The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean
	> > > scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
	> > > Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the best
	> > &g t; architectures practise?
	> > > I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's
	> > > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as
	> > > JDBC,hibernate and others.
	> > > Sorry for my poor english.
	> > >
	> > > btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsf
	> > > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!
	> > > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in
	> > > new version! Please.
	> > >
	> > >
	> > > En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
	> > >
	> > > ________________________________
	> > > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> > --
	> > http://www.irian.at
	> >
	> > Your JSF powerhouse -
	> > JSF Consulting, D evelopment and
	> > Courses in English and German
	> >
	> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
	> >
	> 
	> 
	> 
	> -- 
	> Matthias Wessendorf
	> 
	> further stuff:
	> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
	> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
	> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
	
	
	
________________________________

	Windows Live Writer,支持离线撰写博客内容,随时随地想写就写。 立即使用! <http://get.live.cn/product/writer.html>  


RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks a lot.
 
My main question is "Which is the best Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture practise"? Let's discuss it more. 
 
I think that the advice to apache must be think better of:
    Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsfimplements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation! Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in new version! 
 
I use JavaServer Faces from 2004 in real application, and I have write a rapid java development tool with myfaces. but which is the best practise is still puzzle me.
 
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:04:59 +0200> From: matzew@apache.org> To: users@myfaces.apache.org> Subject: Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org> wrote:> > Hi,> >> > cagatay has published a very nice example application called> > "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:> >> > http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25> >> > facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to> > study a real world jsf web application:> >> > http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies> >> > Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology> > stacks related to jsf.> > just a minor comment. FacesGoodies uses Orchestra's extra scopes,> which I really strongly recommend to use.> > See:> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/> > -M> > >> > cheer
 s,> >> > Gerald> >> >> > 2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:> >> >> > >> > > Hi,anybody!> > > I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice Myfaces/Jsf> > > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise Myfaces/Jsf> > > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?> > > The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean> > > scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.> > > Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the best> > > architectures practise?> > > I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's> > > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as> > > JDBC,hibernate and others.> > > Sorry for my poor english.> > >> > > btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsf> > > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!> > > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanb
 ox in> > > new version! Please.> > >> > >> > > En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04> > >> > > ________________________________> > > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!> >> >> >> > --> > http://www.irian.at> >> > Your JSF powerhouse -> > JSF Consulting, Development and> > Courses in English and German> >> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf> > further stuff:> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
_________________________________________________________________
用手机MSN聊天写邮件看空间,无限沟通,分享精彩!
http://mobile.msn.com.cn/

Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I'll add orchestra to moviestore too if I can make it work:)

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  cagatay has published a very nice example application called
> >  "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:
> >
> >
> http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25
> >
> >  facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to
> >  study a real world jsf web application:
> >
> >  http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies
> >
> >  Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology
> >  stacks related to jsf.
>
> just a minor comment. FacesGoodies uses Orchestra's extra scopes,
> which I really strongly recommend to use.
>
> See:
>
> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/
>
> -M
>
> >
> >  cheers,
> >
> >  Gerald
> >
> >
> >  2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > >
> >  >  Hi,anybody!
> >  >      I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice
> Myfaces/Jsf
> >  > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise
> Myfaces/Jsf
> >  > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?
> >  >      The main question of mine is about real application's managed
> bean
> >  > scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
> >  >      Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is
> the best
> >  > architectures practise?
> >  >      I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's
> >  > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as
> >  > JDBC,hibernate and others.
> >  >      Sorry for my poor english.
> >  >
> >  >      btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or
> two Jsf
> >  > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache
> foundation!
> >  > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and
> sanbox in
> >  > new version! Please.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >      En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
> >  >
> >  > ________________________________
> >  > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!
> >
> >
> >
> >  --
> >  http://www.irian.at
> >
> >  Your JSF powerhouse -
> >  JSF Consulting, Development and
> >  Courses in English and German
> >
> >  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>

Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  cagatay has published a very nice example application called
>  "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:
>
>  http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25
>
>  facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to
>  study a real world jsf web application:
>
>  http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies
>
>  Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology
>  stacks related to jsf.

just a minor comment. FacesGoodies uses Orchestra's extra scopes,
which I really strongly recommend to use.

See:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/

-M

>
>  cheers,
>
>  Gerald
>
>
>  2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:
>
>
> >
>  >  Hi,anybody!
>  >      I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice Myfaces/Jsf
>  > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise Myfaces/Jsf
>  > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?
>  >      The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean
>  > scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
>  >      Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the best
>  > architectures practise?
>  >      I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's
>  > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as
>  > JDBC,hibernate and others.
>  >      Sorry for my poor english.
>  >
>  >      btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsf
>  > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!
>  > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in
>  > new version! Please.
>  >
>  >
>  >      En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
>  >
>  > ________________________________
>  > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!
>
>
>
>  --
>  http://www.irian.at
>
>  Your JSF powerhouse -
>  JSF Consulting, Development and
>  Courses in English and German
>
>  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application architectures

Posted by Gerald Müllan <gm...@apache.org>.
Hi,

cagatay has published a very nice example application called
"moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:

http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25

facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to
study a real world jsf web application:

http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies

Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology
stacks related to jsf.

cheers,

Gerald


2008/4/4 周恩 <ej...@hotmail.com>:
>
>  Hi,anybody!
>      I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice Myfaces/Jsf
> enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise Myfaces/Jsf
> application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?
>      The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean
> scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
>      Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the best
> architectures practise?
>      I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's
> persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as
> JDBC,hibernate and others.
>      Sorry for my poor english.
>
>      btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsf
> implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!
> Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in
> new version! Please.
>
>
>      En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
>
> ________________________________
> "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!



-- 
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces