You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/08 18:01:52 UTC

ChainingModel abstract?

Hi devs,

Is there any particular reason that ChainingModel (default implem of
IChainingModel) is abstract?

Thanks in advance,
Sebastien.

Re: ChainingModel abstract?

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

Thanks a lot, Martin! I didn't find the time manage it! :/

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6123
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>

Re: ChainingModel abstract?

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6123

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Sebastien,
>
> I think it is OK to make it non-abstract.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Is there any particular reason that ChainingModel (default implem of
>> IChainingModel) is abstract?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Sebastien.
>>
>
>

Re: ChainingModel abstract?

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

Hi Sebastien,

I think it is OK to make it non-abstract.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> Is there any particular reason that ChainingModel (default implem of
> IChainingModel) is abstract?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sebastien.
>