You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@struts.apache.org by "Don Brown (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/07/10 07:21:16 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (WW-1376) Struts configuration files should be
named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376?page=all ]
Don Brown resolved WW-1376:
---------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, so now Struts has struts.xml with its own DTD
> Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-1376
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376
> Project: Struts 2
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Reporter: Don Brown
> Assignee: Don Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> As part of the renaming and WW cleanup process, I think Struts should have its own configuration DTD, so users would use it and not the XWork one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Resolved: (WW-1376) Struts configuration files should
be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
As I understand it, our goal is to shield our users from having to know
about XWork, and that would include its DTD. Allowing XWork details to
leak through makes it confusing to find documentation, know where to
submit tickets, and ask for help.
The downside is maintaining the DTD, which is essentially the XWork 1.1
DTD in Struts, however this file is small and shouldn't be a problem.
Also, it should be noted that we are still able to recognize and process
historical xwork.xml files.
Don
Gabe wrote:
> Question on this and the overall philosophy that is the goal for Struts 2. Why is it necessary to have a struts dtd rather than simply use the xwork dtd and then simply add the feature that allows the name to be changed from xwork.xml to struts.xml?
>
> Is the goal still to keep XWork functionality out of Struts 2 or has it been resolved to create an abstraction layer around XWork so Struts 2 users don't use XWork directly at all?
>
> Thanks,
> Gabe
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Don Brown (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
> To: issues@struts.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 1:21:16 AM
> Subject: [jira] Resolved: (WW-1376) Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
>
> [ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376?page=all ]
>
> Don Brown resolved WW-1376:
> ---------------------------
>
> Resolution: Fixed
>
> Fixed, so now Struts has struts.xml with its own DTD
>
>> Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: WW-1376
>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376
>> Project: Struts 2
>> Type: Improvement
>
>> Components: Configuration
>> Reporter: Don Brown
>> Assignee: Don Brown
>> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>> As part of the renaming and WW cleanup process, I think Struts should have its own configuration DTD, so users would use it and not the XWork one.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [jira] Resolved: (WW-1376) Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
Posted by Gabe <gj...@yahoo.com>.
Question on this and the overall philosophy that is the goal for Struts 2. Why is it necessary to have a struts dtd rather than simply use the xwork dtd and then simply add the feature that allows the name to be changed from xwork.xml to struts.xml?
Is the goal still to keep XWork functionality out of Struts 2 or has it been resolved to create an abstraction layer around XWork so Struts 2 users don't use XWork directly at all?
Thanks,
Gabe
----- Original Message ----
From: Don Brown (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
To: issues@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 1:21:16 AM
Subject: [jira] Resolved: (WW-1376) Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376?page=all ]
Don Brown resolved WW-1376:
---------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, so now Struts has struts.xml with its own DTD
> Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-1376
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376
> Project: Struts 2
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Reporter: Don Brown
> Assignee: Don Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> As part of the renaming and WW cleanup process, I think Struts should have its own configuration DTD, so users would use it and not the XWork one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org