You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by gabriel kastenbaum <gk...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/10 14:26:22 UTC
Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Hi everybody,
I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
"brokerName"
by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
-Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
and in activemq.xml
<broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not set".
I have the following message in the logs: WARN
multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
<broker brokerName="myHostName">
I have the same message.
Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers working
with multicast?
Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Posted by Fritz Oconer <fo...@exist.com>.
Hi,
The fix has also been applied to 4.1.0 release. The binary can be downloaded
in http://activemq.org/site/activemq-410-release.html.
Regards,
Fritz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marlon Santos" <ms...@exist.com>
To: <ac...@geronimo.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
>
> Hi,
>
> This was already fixed in trunk.
>
> Regards...
>
>
>
> OLF wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it is the default configuration delivered with ActiveMQ 4.0.1.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Olaf
>>
>>
>> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> can you send your xml configuration?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Marlon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OLF wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> gabriel kastenbaum wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
>>>>>> "brokerName"
>>>>>> by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
>>>>>> -Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and in activemq.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not
>>>>>> set".
>>>>>> I have the following message in the logs: WARN
>>>>>> multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
>>>>>> <broker brokerName="myHostName">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have the same message.
>>>>>> Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers
>>>>>> working
>>>>>> with multicast?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HI!
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you tried using defaultBroker as the brokername instead of the
>>>>> ${activemq.brokerName} u were using?
>>>>>
>>>>> hope that helps...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I got the same warning. The warning is generated by the discoveryagent,
>>>> when the connector ist started.
>>>> The discoveryagent is newly created, if it does not exist. The
>>>> brokerName property of the discoveryagent
>>>> is not set yet. The discoveryagent is started then and prints the
>>>> warning.
>>>>
>>>> I think this is a bug, because if the agent is created from scratch, it
>>>> should be supplied with the brokername property of the connector for
>>>> which it is created.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Starting-ActiveMQ%3A-brokerName-not-set--tf2613148.html#a7716770
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Posted by Marlon Santos <ms...@exist.com>.
Hi,
This was already fixed in trunk.
Regards...
OLF wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it is the default configuration delivered with ActiveMQ 4.0.1.
>
> regards
>
> Olaf
>
>
> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can you send your xml configuration?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>>
>> OLF wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gabriel kastenbaum wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
>>>>> "brokerName"
>>>>> by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
>>>>> -Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
>>>>>
>>>>> and in activemq.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> <broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
>>>>>
>>>>> The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not
>>>>> set".
>>>>> I have the following message in the logs: WARN
>>>>> multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
>>>>> <broker brokerName="myHostName">
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the same message.
>>>>> Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
>>>>>
>>>>> y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers
>>>>> working
>>>>> with multicast?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HI!
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried using defaultBroker as the brokername instead of the
>>>> ${activemq.brokerName} u were using?
>>>>
>>>> hope that helps...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got the same warning. The warning is generated by the discoveryagent,
>>> when the connector ist started.
>>> The discoveryagent is newly created, if it does not exist. The
>>> brokerName property of the discoveryagent
>>> is not set yet. The discoveryagent is started then and prints the
>>> warning.
>>>
>>> I think this is a bug, because if the agent is created from scratch, it
>>> should be supplied with the brokername property of the connector for
>>> which it is created.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Starting-ActiveMQ%3A-brokerName-not-set--tf2613148.html#a7716770
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Posted by OLF <ol...@afrika-virus.de>.
Hi,
it is the default configuration delivered with ActiveMQ 4.0.1.
regards
Olaf
Marlon Santos wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can you send your xml configuration?
>
> regards,
>
> Marlon
>
>
>
> OLF wrote:
>>
>>
>> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> gabriel kastenbaum wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
>>>> "brokerName"
>>>> by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
>>>> -Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
>>>>
>>>> and in activemq.xml
>>>>
>>>> <broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
>>>>
>>>> The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not
>>>> set".
>>>> I have the following message in the logs: WARN
>>>> multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
>>>> <broker brokerName="myHostName">
>>>>
>>>> I have the same message.
>>>> Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
>>>>
>>>> y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers
>>>> working
>>>> with multicast?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> HI!
>>>
>>> Have you tried using defaultBroker as the brokername instead of the
>>> ${activemq.brokerName} u were using?
>>>
>>> hope that helps...
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got the same warning. The warning is generated by the discoveryagent,
>> when the connector ist started.
>> The discoveryagent is newly created, if it does not exist. The brokerName
>> property of the discoveryagent
>> is not set yet. The discoveryagent is started then and prints the
>> warning.
>>
>> I think this is a bug, because if the agent is created from scratch, it
>> should be supplied with the brokername property of the connector for
>> which it is created.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Starting-ActiveMQ%3A-brokerName-not-set--tf2613148.html#a7714553
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Posted by Marlon Santos <ms...@exist.com>.
Hi,
can you send your xml configuration?
regards,
Marlon
OLF wrote:
>
>
> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> gabriel kastenbaum wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
>>> "brokerName"
>>> by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
>>> -Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
>>>
>>> and in activemq.xml
>>>
>>> <broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
>>>
>>> The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not set".
>>> I have the following message in the logs: WARN
>>> multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
>>> <broker brokerName="myHostName">
>>>
>>> I have the same message.
>>> Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
>>>
>>> y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers working
>>> with multicast?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> HI!
>>
>> Have you tried using defaultBroker as the brokername instead of the
>> ${activemq.brokerName} u were using?
>>
>> hope that helps...
>>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I got the same warning. The warning is generated by the discoveryagent,
> when the connector ist started.
> The discoveryagent is newly created, if it does not exist. The brokerName
> property of the discoveryagent
> is not set yet. The discoveryagent is started then and prints the warning.
>
> I think this is a bug, because if the agent is created from scratch, it
> should be supplied with the brokername property of the connector for which
> it is created.
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Starting-ActiveMQ%3A-brokerName-not-set--tf2613148.html#a7711932
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Posted by OLF <ol...@afrika-virus.de>.
Marlon Santos wrote:
>
>
>
> gabriel kastenbaum wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
>> "brokerName"
>> by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
>> -Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
>>
>> and in activemq.xml
>>
>> <broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
>>
>> The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not set".
>> I have the following message in the logs: WARN
>> multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
>>
>>
>> In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
>> <broker brokerName="myHostName">
>>
>> I have the same message.
>> Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
>>
>> y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers working
>> with multicast?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> HI!
>
> Have you tried using defaultBroker as the brokername instead of the
> ${activemq.brokerName} u were using?
>
> hope that helps...
>
Hi,
I got the same warning. The warning is generated by the discoveryagent, when
the connector ist started.
The discoveryagent is newly created, if it does not exist. The brokerName
property of the discoveryagent
is not set yet. The discoveryagent is started then and prints the warning.
I think this is a bug, because if the agent is created from scratch, it
should be supplied with the brokername property of the connector for which
it is created.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Starting-ActiveMQ%3A-brokerName-not-set--tf2613148.html#a7698901
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Starting ActiveMQ: brokerName not set?
Posted by Marlon Santos <ms...@exist.com>.
gabriel kastenbaum wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am trying to start a network of brokers. I would like to set the
> "brokerName"
> by the script that starts the broker with the propertie
> -Dactivemq.brokerName=$HOSTNAME
>
> and in activemq.xml
>
> <broker ... brokerName="${activemq.brokerName}">
>
> The point is that the brokerName is not set - or seems to be "not set".
> I have the following message in the logs: WARN
> multicast.MulticastDiscoveryAgent <BrokerName is not set>
>
>
> In fact even if I hard code a name in the configuration
> <broker brokerName="myHostName">
>
> I have the same message.
> Do I have to take into account the WARN message?
>
> y the way: Is the brokerName mandatory with a network of brokers working
> with multicast?
>
>
>
>
HI!
Have you tried using defaultBroker as the brokername instead of the
${activemq.brokerName} u were using?
hope that helps...
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Starting-ActiveMQ%3A-brokerName-not-set--tf2613148.html#a7353053
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.