You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by ZhangJian He <sh...@gmail.com> on 2021/12/15 11:19:37 UTC

Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

Hello,
@LinLin @lipenghui

I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2.

It's a compatible problem since 2.8, and we already commited it to master
and branch 2.9


Thanks
ZhangJian He

Re: Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.

+1
Enrico

Il giorno mer 15 dic 2021 alle ore 14:27 PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> ha
scritto:

> We should contain #13291 in 2.8.2.
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:19 PM ZhangJian He <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > @LinLin @lipenghui
> >
> > I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2.
> >
> > It's a compatible problem since 2.8, and we already commited it to master
> > and branch 2.9
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > ZhangJian He
> >
>

Re: Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.

We should contain #13291 in 2.8.2.

Penghui

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:19 PM ZhangJian He <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> @LinLin @lipenghui
>
> I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2.
>
> It's a compatible problem since 2.8, and we already commited it to master
> and branch 2.9
>
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
>