You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Larry White <lj...@gmail.com> on 2022/09/01 00:14:36 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Substrait for Flight SQL
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:55 PM Vinicius Fraga <sx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, 20:51 David Li, <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am proposing to extend the Flight SQL specification with the following
> > features:
> >
> > - Support for queries using Substrait [1]
> > - Explicit transaction RPCs
> > - Explicit cancellation of distributed queries
> >
> > The proposal was discussed previously in [2]. The new Protobuf
> > definitions, an implementation for C++ and Java, and integration tests,
> are
> > available at [3] with some further discussion.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal
> > [ ] 0 : No opinion
> > [ ] -1 : Do not accept this proposal because...
> >
> > [1]: https://substrait.io/
> > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6j0nc43y7czs2m4kpzrckmrtgr9qs9z
> > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13492
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Substrait for Flight SQL
Posted by James Henderson <jm...@juxt.pro>.
+1 (non-binding)
--
James Henderson
XTDB Development Manager at JUXT
Email jms@juxt.pro
Website https://juxt.pro
[image: photo]
Re: [VOTE] Substrait for Flight SQL
Posted by James Duong <ja...@bitquilltech.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:49 PM Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 5:15 PM Larry White <lj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:55 PM Vinicius Fraga <sx...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, 20:51 David Li, <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am proposing to extend the Flight SQL specification with the
> > following
> > > > features:
> > > >
> > > > - Support for queries using Substrait [1]
> > > > - Explicit transaction RPCs
> > > > - Explicit cancellation of distributed queries
> > > >
> > > > The proposal was discussed previously in [2]. The new Protobuf
> > > > definitions, an implementation for C++ and Java, and integration
> tests,
> > > are
> > > > available at [3] with some further discussion.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal
> > > > [ ] 0 : No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 : Do not accept this proposal because...
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://substrait.io/
> > > > [2]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6j0nc43y7czs2m4kpzrckmrtgr9qs9z
> > > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13492
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
*James Duong*
Lead Software Developer
Bit Quill Technologies Inc.
Direct: +1.604.562.6082 | jamesd@bitquilltech.com
https://www.bitquilltech.com
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message. Thank you.
Re: [VOTE] Substrait for Flight SQL
Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 5:15 PM Larry White <lj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:55 PM Vinicius Fraga <sx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, 20:51 David Li, <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am proposing to extend the Flight SQL specification with the
> following
> > > features:
> > >
> > > - Support for queries using Substrait [1]
> > > - Explicit transaction RPCs
> > > - Explicit cancellation of distributed queries
> > >
> > > The proposal was discussed previously in [2]. The new Protobuf
> > > definitions, an implementation for C++ and Java, and integration tests,
> > are
> > > available at [3] with some further discussion.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal
> > > [ ] 0 : No opinion
> > > [ ] -1 : Do not accept this proposal because...
> > >
> > > [1]: https://substrait.io/
> > > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6j0nc43y7czs2m4kpzrckmrtgr9qs9z
> > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13492
> > >
> >
>