You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Bruce Brouwer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/04/14 04:44:15 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-547) Update LoggerStream API

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Bruce Brouwer updated LOG4J2-547:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: log4j2-547-new-module.patch

I've added log4j2-547-new-module.patch. It makes a new module called log4j-streams. It also changes the direction of looking for FQCN. It also includes tests to show that FQCN works for the streams. As I cannot create a branch, I'm providing this patch. You can decide how to apply this patch, either as a branch or into trunk. 

> Update LoggerStream API
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-547
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-rc1
>            Reporter: Matt Sicker
>            Assignee: Ralph Goers
>             Fix For: 2.0-rc2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-PrintStream-API-update.patch, MyBenchmark.java, PerfTestCalcLocation.java, log4j2-547-bbrouwer.patch, log4j2-547-new-module.patch, log4j2-547-remove-streams.patch, log4j2-loggerStream.patch
>
>
> I've got some ideas on how to improve the LoggerStream idea that I added a little while ago. The main thing I'd like to do is extract an interface from it, rename the default implementation to SimpleLoggerStream (part of the SimpleLogger stuff), and allow log4j implementations to specify a different implementation if desired.
> In doing this, I'm not sure where specifically I'd prefer the getStream methods to be. Right now, it's in Logger, but really, it could be in LoggerContext instead. I don't think I should be required to get a Logger just to get a LoggerStream.
> Now if only the java.io package used interfaces instead of classes. This would be so much easier to design!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org