You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by "Ian Boston (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/11/07 01:49:44 UTC

[jira] Commented: (SHINDIG-681) JPA Samples - GroupDb table name 'group' is a reserved word in some persistence layers / databases

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645644#action_12645644 ] 

Ian Boston commented on SHINDIG-681:
------------------------------------

person_group is good,
thanks for spotting this one.


> JPA Samples - GroupDb table name 'group' is a reserved word in some persistence layers / databases
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHINDIG-681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-681
>             Project: Shindig
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Common Components (Java)
>         Environment: osx
>            Reporter: Ben Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 0.25h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> org.apache.shindig.social.opensocial.jpa.GroupDb table name 'group' is a reserved word in some persistence layers / databases and certainly causes errors in Hibernate and MySQL.
> There's no point my providing a patch for this as I think it's best if you choose the table name as you'll be able to keep it consistent. I thought 'person_group' would be closest to the truth.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.