You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Edi STOJICEVIC <es...@debianworld.org> on 2008/03/13 11:34:16 UTC
Issue with the size of dumped/loaded repositories
Hi,
I'm new on this list ...
I have a little issue with some repositories that I need to migrate from
one server to a new one.
Here is the description :
Source server :
xfs filesystem
fsfs
Target server :
ext3 filesystem
fsfs
Now I have a difference on some of the repositories.
By example, one repository on the source has a size of 68Mb and 73Mb on
the destination.
I checked the size of the various directories and apparently it's coming
from the /repo/db/revs/ one ...
I have the same number of files on each side, same number of revions
when doing a svn log by example but I have just some files bigger on the
destination...
I have the same with some other repositories and dont know if they have
to be the same exactly... I assume they should but not sure if svnadmin
is not doing something ...
If anybody has an idea ...
regards,
--
. ''`. (\___/) E d i S T O J I C E V I C
: :' : (='.'=) http://www.debianworld.org
`. `~' (")_(") GPG: 0x1237B032
`-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Issue with the size of dumped/loaded repositories
Posted by Edi STOJICEVIC <es...@debianworld.org>.
* Andy Levy <an...@gmail.com> [2008-03-13 08:25:19 -0400] wrote :
[...]
> Be advised that 1.1.4 is VERY old, and unsupported. You really ought
> to get upgraded at least to a supported release, even if you have to
> build it yourself.
I know but its not me who build that ;)
> > > Have you accounted for differences in "extra" space required/consumed
> > > by the 2 different filesystems (journaling, etc.)?
> > >
> > > Maybe just a difference in how the skip-delta algorithm picked when &
> > > where to save full copies?
> >
> > Think it's probably because not the same server version ...
>
> Yes, that is most likely the culprit.
Thanks for the quick reply ;)
--
. ''`. (\___/) E d i S T O J I C E V I C
: :' : (='.'=) http://www.debianworld.org
`. `~' (")_(") GPG: 0x1237B032
`-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Issue with the size of dumped/loaded repositories
Posted by Andy Levy <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Edi STOJICEVIC
<es...@debianworld.org> wrote:
> * Andy Levy <an...@gmail.com> [2008-03-13 08:16:54 -0400] wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Edi STOJICEVIC
> > <es...@debianworld.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm new on this list ...
> > >
> > > I have a little issue with some repositories that I need to migrate from
> > > one server to a new one.
> > >
> > > Here is the description :
> > >
> > > Source server :
> > > xfs filesystem
> > > fsfs
> > >
> > > Target server :
> > > ext3 filesystem
> > > fsfs
> > >
> > > Now I have a difference on some of the repositories.
> > > By example, one repository on the source has a size of 68Mb and 73Mb on
> > > the destination.
> > > I checked the size of the various directories and apparently it's coming
> > > from the /repo/db/revs/ one ...
> > > I have the same number of files on each side, same number of revions
> > > when doing a svn log by example but I have just some files bigger on the
> > > destination...
> > >
> > > I have the same with some other repositories and dont know if they have
> > > to be the same exactly... I assume they should but not sure if svnadmin
> > > is not doing something ...
> >
> > What version of SVN on each server?
>
> I checked and source 1.3.2 and 1.1.4 on the new one ... The reason of
> why is it so old it's because they have redhat 4 modified using this old
> version ...
Be advised that 1.1.4 is VERY old, and unsupported. You really ought
to get upgraded at least to a supported release, even if you have to
build it yourself.
> > Have you accounted for differences in "extra" space required/consumed
> > by the 2 different filesystems (journaling, etc.)?
> >
> > Maybe just a difference in how the skip-delta algorithm picked when &
> > where to save full copies?
>
> Think it's probably because not the same server version ...
Yes, that is most likely the culprit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Issue with the size of dumped/loaded repositories
Posted by Edi STOJICEVIC <es...@debianworld.org>.
* Andy Levy <an...@gmail.com> [2008-03-13 08:16:54 -0400] wrote :
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Edi STOJICEVIC
> <es...@debianworld.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm new on this list ...
> >
> > I have a little issue with some repositories that I need to migrate from
> > one server to a new one.
> >
> > Here is the description :
> >
> > Source server :
> > xfs filesystem
> > fsfs
> >
> > Target server :
> > ext3 filesystem
> > fsfs
> >
> > Now I have a difference on some of the repositories.
> > By example, one repository on the source has a size of 68Mb and 73Mb on
> > the destination.
> > I checked the size of the various directories and apparently it's coming
> > from the /repo/db/revs/ one ...
> > I have the same number of files on each side, same number of revions
> > when doing a svn log by example but I have just some files bigger on the
> > destination...
> >
> > I have the same with some other repositories and dont know if they have
> > to be the same exactly... I assume they should but not sure if svnadmin
> > is not doing something ...
>
> What version of SVN on each server?
I checked and source 1.3.2 and 1.1.4 on the new one ... The reason of
why is it so old it's because they have redhat 4 modified using this old
version ...
> Have you accounted for differences in "extra" space required/consumed
> by the 2 different filesystems (journaling, etc.)?
>
> Maybe just a difference in how the skip-delta algorithm picked when &
> where to save full copies?
Think it's probably because not the same server version ...
Thanks,
--
. ''`. (\___/) E d i S T O J I C E V I C
: :' : (='.'=) http://www.debianworld.org
`. `~' (")_(") GPG: 0x1237B032
`-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Issue with the size of dumped/loaded repositories
Posted by Andy Levy <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Edi STOJICEVIC
<es...@debianworld.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new on this list ...
>
> I have a little issue with some repositories that I need to migrate from
> one server to a new one.
>
> Here is the description :
>
> Source server :
> xfs filesystem
> fsfs
>
> Target server :
> ext3 filesystem
> fsfs
>
> Now I have a difference on some of the repositories.
> By example, one repository on the source has a size of 68Mb and 73Mb on
> the destination.
> I checked the size of the various directories and apparently it's coming
> from the /repo/db/revs/ one ...
> I have the same number of files on each side, same number of revions
> when doing a svn log by example but I have just some files bigger on the
> destination...
>
> I have the same with some other repositories and dont know if they have
> to be the same exactly... I assume they should but not sure if svnadmin
> is not doing something ...
What version of SVN on each server?
Have you accounted for differences in "extra" space required/consumed
by the 2 different filesystems (journaling, etc.)?
Maybe just a difference in how the skip-delta algorithm picked when &
where to save full copies?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org