You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/13 14:15:29 UTC
make check fails
Hello,
I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
wrong, and please advise.
Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
If more logs are needed, let me know.
Re: make check fails
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
On 13 Nov 2009, at 13:15, Vlad GURDIGA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
> wrong, and please advise.
Yep.
> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>
> If more logs are needed, let me know.
Distro, version of CouchDB, &c?
Re: make check fails
Posted by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>> wrong, and please advise.
>>
>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>
>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>
>
> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src directory?
>
> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
Here it comes:
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
/home/vladd/src/couchdb
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/trunk
Repository Root: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 835873
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: davisp
Last Changed Rev: 835195
Last Changed Date: 2009-11-12 04:17:41 +0200 (Thu, 12 Nov 2009)
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$ prove -v test/etap/*.t
test/etap/001-load.t ......................
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/002-erl-driver.t ................
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/010-file-basics.t ...............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/011-file-headers.t ..............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/020-btree-basics.t ..............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/021-btree-reductions.t ..........
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/030-doc-from-json.t .............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/031-doc-to-json.t ...............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/040-util.t ......................
test/etap/040-util.t:79: Warning: variable 'IntsToAGazillion' is unused
test/etap/040-util.t:80: Warning: variable 'LotsOfData' is unused
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/041-uuid-gen.t ..................
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/050-stream.t ....................
test/etap/050-stream.t:71: Warning: variable 'Acc2' is unused
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/060-kt-merging.t ................
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/061-kt-missing-leaves.t .........
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/062-kt-remove-leaves.t ..........
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/063-kt-get-leaves.t .............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/064-kt-counting.t ...............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/065-kt-stemming.t ...............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/070-couch-db.t ..................
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/080-config-get-set.t ............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/081-config-override.t ...........
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/082-config-register.t ...........
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/083-config-no-files.t ...........
test/etap/083-config-no-files.t:16: Warning: function default_config/0 is unused
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/090-task-status.t ...............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/100-ref-counter.t ...............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t .........
test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t:132: Warning: variable 'Req2' is unused
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t ..
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t ..
test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t:123: Warning: variable
'HighSeq' is unused
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/120-stats-collect.t .............
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
test/etap/121-stats-aggregates.t ..........
escript: exception error: undefined function test_util:init_code_path/0
in function erl_eval:do_apply/5
in call from erl_eval:exprs/5
in call from escript:code_handler/4
in call from erl_eval:local_func/5
in call from escript:interpret/3
in call from escript:start/1
in call from init:start_it/1
Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
No subtests run
Test Summary Report
-------------------
test/etap/001-load.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/002-erl-driver.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/010-file-basics.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/011-file-headers.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/020-btree-basics.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/021-btree-reductions.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/030-doc-from-json.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/031-doc-to-json.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/040-util.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/041-uuid-gen.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/050-stream.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/060-kt-merging.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/061-kt-missing-leaves.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/062-kt-remove-leaves.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/063-kt-get-leaves.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/064-kt-counting.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/065-kt-stemming.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/070-couch-db.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/080-config-get-set.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/081-config-override.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/082-config-register.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/083-config-no-files.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/090-task-status.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/100-ref-counter.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/120-stats-collect.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
test/etap/121-stats-aggregates.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Files=29, Tests=0, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr 0.06 sys + 3.49 cusr
0.89 csys = 4.57 CPU)
Result: FAIL
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>
> Paul Davis
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>.
I've tried to checkout the source trunk anew. Everything worked. Then
went back to the broken one, svn update-d, ./bootstrap && ./configure
&& make check failed again. After a "make clean" everything worked
perfectly. =( make check and Futon test suite.
Sorry for the so much noise.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Joseph Davis
>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis
>>>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>>>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>>>>>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src
>>>>>>>>> directory?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks good:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>>>>>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>>>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>>>>>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>>>>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>>>>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>>>>>>> ^C
>>>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
>>>>>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>>>>>>> security_validation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>
>>>>> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
>>>>>
>>>>> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
>>>>> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
>>>>> http://pastie.org/702240.
>>>>>
>>>>> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
>>>>> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
>>>>> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
>>>>> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
>>>>> and I'm not wasting your time?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ ./test/etap/run
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
>>>>>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
>>>>>> probably need to do:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To get the new build system updates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output. If
>>>> you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in your diff.
>>>>
>>>> Then it should just be:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t
>>>
>>> OK, here it comes: http://pastie.org/702292
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent replication
>>>> to 127.0.0.1 or anything right? That's about the only reason I can think of
>>>> that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x replication tests.
>>>
>>> Probably not: I'm using only localhost to access CouchDB, but for the
>>> sake of this test I've shut down iptables.
>>>
>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Vlad,
>>
>> Hmm, do you happen to have a version of Mochiweb installed into your
>> system library directory?
>
> I'm not sure what "system library directory" means and I ran a find instead:
>
> [root@kpax ~]# find / -type d -name \*mochiweb\*
> /home/vladd/src/couchdb/src/mochiweb
> /home/vladd/src/0.10.0/src/mochiweb
> /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/mochiweb-r97
> [root@kpax ~]#
>
>> Or perhaps an old version in
>> $PREFIX/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/?
>
> [vladd@kpax cozy]$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib
> total 44
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-09-30 16:48 couch-0.10.0
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-11-13 15:20 couch-0.10.1
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 couch-0.11.0a817170
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-10-15 13:42 couch-0.11.0b825459
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-10-15 15:20 couch-0.11.0b825472
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-11-03 13:46 couch-0.11.0b832396
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-11-13 15:09 couch-0.11.0b835834
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 erlang-oauth
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-30 16:48 etap
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 ibrowse-1.5.2
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 mochiweb-r97
> [vladd@kpax cozy]$
>
>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Joseph Davis
>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis
>>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>>>>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src
>>>>>>>> directory?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks good:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>>>>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>>>>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>>>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>>>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>>>>>> ^C
>>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
>>>>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>>>>>> security_validation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>
>>>>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>
>>>> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
>>>>
>>>> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
>>>> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
>>>> http://pastie.org/702240.
>>>>
>>>> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
>>>> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
>>>> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
>>>> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
>>>> and I'm not wasting your time?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>> $ ./test/etap/run
>>>>>
>>>>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
>>>>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
>>>>> probably need to do:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>>>>>
>>>>> To get the new build system updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output. If
>>> you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in your diff.
>>>
>>> Then it should just be:
>>>
>>> $ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t
>>
>> OK, here it comes: http://pastie.org/702292
>>
>>>
>>> You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent replication
>>> to 127.0.0.1 or anything right? That's about the only reason I can think of
>>> that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x replication tests.
>>
>> Probably not: I'm using only localhost to access CouchDB, but for the
>> sake of this test I've shut down iptables.
>>
>>> Paul Davis
>>>
>>
>
> Vlad,
>
> Hmm, do you happen to have a version of Mochiweb installed into your
> system library directory?
I'm not sure what "system library directory" means and I ran a find instead:
[root@kpax ~]# find / -type d -name \*mochiweb\*
/home/vladd/src/couchdb/src/mochiweb
/home/vladd/src/0.10.0/src/mochiweb
/usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/mochiweb-r97
[root@kpax ~]#
> Or perhaps an old version in
> $PREFIX/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/?
[vladd@kpax cozy]$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib
total 44
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-09-30 16:48 couch-0.10.0
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-11-13 15:20 couch-0.10.1
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 couch-0.11.0a817170
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-10-15 13:42 couch-0.11.0b825459
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-10-15 15:20 couch-0.11.0b825472
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-11-03 13:46 couch-0.11.0b832396
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-11-13 15:09 couch-0.11.0b835834
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 erlang-oauth
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-30 16:48 etap
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 ibrowse-1.5.2
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-09-21 09:33 mochiweb-r97
[vladd@kpax cozy]$
>
> Paul
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Joseph Davis
> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis
>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>>>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src
>>>>>>> directory?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good:
>>>>>
>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>>>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>>>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>>>>> ^C
>>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
>>>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>>>>> security_validation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vlad,
>>>>
>>>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>
>>> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
>>>
>>> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
>>> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
>>> http://pastie.org/702240.
>>>
>>> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
>>> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
>>> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
>>> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
>>> and I'm not wasting your time?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> $ ./test/etap/run
>>>>
>>>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
>>>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
>>>> probably need to do:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>>>>
>>>> To get the new build system updates.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>
>>
>> Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output. If
>> you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in your diff.
>>
>> Then it should just be:
>>
>> $ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t
>
> OK, here it comes: http://pastie.org/702292
>
>>
>> You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent replication
>> to 127.0.0.1 or anything right? That's about the only reason I can think of
>> that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x replication tests.
>
> Probably not: I'm using only localhost to access CouchDB, but for the
> sake of this test I've shut down iptables.
>
>> Paul Davis
>>
>
Vlad,
Hmm, do you happen to have a version of Mochiweb installed into your
system library directory? Or perhaps an old version in
$PREFIX/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/?
Paul
Re: make check fails
Posted by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Joseph Davis
<pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis
>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src
>>>>>> directory?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>>>
>>>> Looks good:
>>>>
>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>>>> ^C
>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
>>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>>>> security_validation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Vlad,
>>>
>>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>
>> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
>>
>> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
>> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
>> http://pastie.org/702240.
>>
>> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
>> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
>> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
>> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
>> and I'm not wasting your time?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> $ ./test/etap/run
>>>
>>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
>>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
>>> probably need to do:
>>>
>>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>>>
>>> To get the new build system updates.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Paul Davis
>>>
>
> Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output. If
> you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in your diff.
>
> Then it should just be:
>
> $ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t
OK, here it comes: http://pastie.org/702292
>
> You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent replication
> to 127.0.0.1 or anything right? That's about the only reason I can think of
> that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x replication tests.
Probably not: I'm using only localhost to access CouchDB, but for the
sake of this test I've shut down iptables.
> Paul Davis
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Paul Joseph Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA
>>>>> <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src
>>>>> directory?
>>>>>
>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>>
>>> Looks good:
>>>
>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>>> ^C
>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>>
>>>
>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test
>>> Suite"
>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>>> security_validation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Vlad,
>>
>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
>
> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
>
> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
> http://pastie.org/702240.
>
> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
> and I'm not wasting your time?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>>
>> or
>>
>> $ ./test/etap/run
>>
>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
>> probably need to do:
>>
>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>>
>> To get the new build system updates.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Paul Davis
>>
Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output.
If you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in
your diff.
Then it should just be:
$ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t
You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent
replication to 127.0.0.1 or anything right? That's about the only
reason I can think of that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x
replication tests.
Paul Davis
Re: make check fails
Posted by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>
>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src directory?
>>>>
>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>
>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>
>>>
>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>
>> Looks good:
>>
>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>> ^C
>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>
>>
>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>> security_validation.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Paul Davis
>>>
>>
>
> Vlad,
>
> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
http://pastie.org/702240.
On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
and I'm not wasting your time?
Thank you!
>
> or
>
> $ ./test/etap/run
>
> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
> probably need to do:
>
> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>
> To get the new build system updates.
>
> HTH,
> Paul Davis
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>
>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src directory?
>>>
>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>
>>> Paul Davis
>>>
>>
>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>
> Looks good:
>
> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
> ^C
> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>
>
> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
> security_validation.
>
>
>
>>
>> Paul Davis
>>
>
Vlad,
$ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
or
$ ./test/etap/run
In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
probably need to do:
$ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
To get the new build system updates.
HTH,
Paul Davis
Re: make check fails
Posted by Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
> <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>
>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>
>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>
>>
>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src directory?
>>
>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>
>> Paul Davis
>>
>
> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
Looks good:
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
/home/vladd/src/couchdb
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
[info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
^C
[vladd@kpax couchdb]$
After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
security_validation.
>
> Paul Davis
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
<pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
>> wrong, and please advise.
>>
>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>
>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>
>
> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src directory?
>
> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>
> Paul Davis
>
Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
Paul Davis
Re: make check fails
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
> wrong, and please advise.
>
> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>
> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>
Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src directory?
$ prove -v test/etap/*.t
Paul Davis
Re: make check fails
Posted by Robert Dionne <di...@dionne-associates.com>.
On Nov 13, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>
> Could it be that CouchDB runs somewhere else on your system
> while you run make check? The replication test is still a bit lacking
> in that regard.
That was my first thought but I believe there are etaps before
replication that would fail first
>
>
Re: make check fails
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Noah, CouchDB is 0.11 r835195 as seen in the log.
ZONK. Thanks Jan. :D
Re: make check fails
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
Hi Vlad,
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:15, Vlad GURDIGA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm
> wrong, and please advise.
This is the correct place, thanks for sending your feedback.
> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
Could it be that CouchDB runs somewhere else on your system
while you run make check? The replication test is still a bit lacking
in that regard.
> If more logs are needed, let me know.
Which operating system are you running on and what are your
Erlang version?
--
Noah, CouchDB is 0.11 r835195 as seen in the log.
Cheers
Jan
--
PS: no need to CC couchdb-dev@incubator.apache.org anymore :)