[YOKO] premature tools deletion?

["Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools.  It would be nice to  
have our own IDL compiler.  I was thinking that we could move tools to  
a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.  Thoughts?


Regards,
Alan

Re: [YOKO] premature tools deletion?

[Alexey Petrenko <al...@gmail.com>]

+1 for keeping tools.

2008/1/17, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
> I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools.  It would be nice to
> have our own IDL compiler.  I was thinking that we could move tools to
> a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.  Thoughts?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>

Re: [YOKO] premature tools deletion?

[Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>]

By the time we release it, it will be renamed to o.a.cxf.something.   
Right now, I'm leaving the package name alone as I merge in some patches 
that IONA has internally to update it to work with the latest CXF (and 
latest CXF dependencies like the newer XmlSchema and such).   If the 
package names change, those patches won't apply cleanly.   Once it all 
builds and tests cleanly, the package names will change.

Dan

On Friday 18 January 2008, Lars Kühne wrote:
> I assume tools will also live in CXF for the IDL<->WSDL compilers. If
> we keep our own copy (which I think is a good idea) we need to make
> sure that our package name is different from theirs. I assume they
> will eventually use o.a.cxf.something, but currently they are not:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/cxf/trunk/tools/corba/src/main/
>java/org/apache/yoko/tools/
>
> On Jan 17, 2008 7:47 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > Keep 'em around, we can always whack them later.
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > > I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools.  It would be nice
> > > to have our own IDL compiler.  I was thinking that we could move
> > > tools to a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.  Thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Re: [YOKO] premature tools deletion?

[Lars Kühne <la...@googlemail.com>]

I assume tools will also live in CXF for the IDL<->WSDL compilers. If
we keep our own copy (which I think is a good idea) we need to make
sure that our package name is different from theirs. I assume they
will eventually use o.a.cxf.something, but currently they are not:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/cxf/trunk/tools/corba/src/main/java/org/apache/yoko/tools/

On Jan 17, 2008 7:47 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Keep 'em around, we can always whack them later.
>
>
> On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools.  It would be nice
> > to have our own IDL compiler.  I was thinking that we could move
> > tools to a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.  Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
>
>

Re: [YOKO] premature tools deletion?

[Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>]

Keep 'em around, we can always whack them later.

On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools.  It would be nice  
> to have our own IDL compiler.  I was thinking that we could move  
> tools to a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.  Thoughts?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>