You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bval.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/01 23:08:37 UTC
releasing?
Hi guys,
last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like to
re-release, any objection?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Ok seems it was more vicious,
since I built locally bval to vote for the release I got a corrupted
artifact locally - of course used java 8 ;) - so seems bval is fine so we
don't need to release since the changelog is empty. Sorry for the noise
guys.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2016-03-02 17:30 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> yep exactly. Makes tomee supporting only Java 8 ATM :(.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2016-03-02 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Okay. Is this specifically a problem because of the difference you
>> reported with Commons Weaver?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> java 7 or java 6 doesn't change the generated bytecode for bval. Java 8
>>> sadly does/did.
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>
>>> 2016-03-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel
>>>> strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum
>>>> appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version.
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release
>>>>> using java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How can we release for > Java 6?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1, anyway
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > +1
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > regards,
>>>>>> > gerhard
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Hi guys,
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd
>>>>>> like to
>>>>>> > > re-release, any objection?
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
yep exactly. Makes tomee supporting only Java 8 ATM :(.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2016-03-02 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
> Okay. Is this specifically a problem because of the difference you
> reported with Commons Weaver?
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> java 7 or java 6 doesn't change the generated bytecode for bval. Java 8
>> sadly does/did.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2016-03-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel
>>> strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum
>>> appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release using
>>>> java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> How can we release for > Java 6?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, anyway
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt
>>>>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > +1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > regards,
>>>>> > gerhard
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>> >:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Hi guys,
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd
>>>>> like to
>>>>> > > re-release, any objection?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
Okay. Is this specifically a problem because of the difference you reported
with Commons Weaver?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> java 7 or java 6 doesn't change the generated bytecode for bval. Java 8
> sadly does/did.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2016-03-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel
>> strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum
>> appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release using
>>> java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough.
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>
>>> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> How can we release for > Java 6?
>>>>
>>>> +1, anyway
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > +1
>>>> >
>>>> > regards,
>>>> > gerhard
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>> >:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi guys,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like
>>>> to
>>>> > > re-release, any objection?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
java 7 or java 6 doesn't change the generated bytecode for bval. Java 8
sadly does/did.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2016-03-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
> How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel
> strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum
> appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version.
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release using
>> java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> How can we release for > Java 6?
>>>
>>> +1, anyway
>>>
>>> Matt
>>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > regards,
>>> > gerhard
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi guys,
>>> > >
>>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like
>>> to
>>> > > re-release, any objection?
>>> > >
>>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel
strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum
appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version.
Matt
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release using
> java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> How can we release for > Java 6?
>>
>> +1, anyway
>>
>> Matt
>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > gerhard
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Hi guys,
>> > >
>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like to
>> > > re-release, any objection?
>> > >
>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release using
java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>:
> How can we release for > Java 6?
>
> +1, anyway
>
> Matt
> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like to
> > > re-release, any objection?
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >
> >
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
How can we release for > Java 6?
+1, anyway
Matt
On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like to
> > re-release, any objection?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
>
Re: releasing?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> Hi guys,
>
> last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like to
> re-release, any objection?
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>