You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/05 07:05:42 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8067) Possible deadlock when creating new ClassInfo entries in the cache

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15853145#comment-15853145 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-8067:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user jwagenleitner opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/489

    GROOVY-8067: Possible deadlock when creating new ClassInfo entries in the cache

    As suggested in PR #484 removed the locking on the `ManagedLinkedList` by creating a new `ManagedConcurrentLinkedQueue`.
    
    Also added a `stress` subproject for tests that employ many threads, need GC, or just in general try to break things and take a long time.  These require a special property to be set in order to run, otherwise they will be skipped.  I tried to work it out in the `performance` subproject, but that seems to be very specialized for the compiler tests.  Open to suggestions on a better way to handle these types of tests.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jwagenleitner/groovy groovy8067-mclq

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/489.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #489
    
----
commit bb2464a919a3655f36707fa72fb30080c92a7288
Author: John Wagenleitner <jw...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-02-05T06:13:26Z

    GROOVY-8067: Possible deadlock when creating new ClassInfo entries in the cache

----


> Possible deadlock when creating new ClassInfo entries in the cache
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-8067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8067
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: groovy-runtime
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.8
>            Reporter: John Wagenleitner
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ClassInfoDeadlockTest.java
>
>
> When running Groovy without {{-Dgroovy.use.classvalue=true}} the ClassInfo instances are cached in a {{ManagedConcurrentMap}} (MCM).  New values are computed on demand and computation involves both a lock on a segment within the MCM and a lock on the {{GlobalClassSet}} (GCS) which is backed by a {{ManagedLinkedList}}.  The problem is that both the ManagedConcurrentMap and the GlobalClassSet share the same ReferenceQueue.
> Assume there is an enqueued {{ClassInfo}} value that is stored in Segment2 of the MCM.  Now assume that Thread1 and Thread2 both request {{ClassInfo.getClassInfo(..)}} for two different classes that do not currently exist in the cache.  Assume that based on hashing Thread1 gets a lock on Segment1 and Thread2 gets a lock on Segment2.  Assume that Thread1 is the first to call computeValue which in turn calls {{GlobalClassSet.add(..)}}.  This call adds a new value to a {{ManagedLinkedList}}, and since it's managed the add operation will process the ReferenceQueue. So Thread1 will attempt to dequeue the ClassInfo and the finalizeReference method on it's entry will attempt to remove it from Segment2. Thread2 holds the lock for Segment2 and Thread2 is blocked and can't progress it's waiting on the the lock Thread1 holds the lock for the GlobalClassSet, so deadlock occurs.
> The attached test case includes a thread dump at the bottom.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)