You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> on 2010/02/16 12:52:29 UTC

Timing for 6.0.25?

Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
6.0.24 it would be good to fix.

Also, if folks have a little time, there are a reasonable number of
proposals in the STATUS file for review. While some are quite involved,
a number are quite simple and should be quick to review.

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 16/02/2010 12:20, Jess Holle wrote:
> Is there a list of such regressions?
> 
> Doing a search for bugs specifically against 6.0.24 and then looking for
> those labeled as regressions shows one bug: 48701
> <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701>.
> 
> 48616 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616> is
> labeled as a blocker rather than a regression, but is apparently also a
> regression.
> 
> Any other regressions to be aware of when considering 6.0.24?

A quick scan down the list of 6.0.24 bugs gives:
48612
48613
48614
48616
48627
48668
48694
48701
48716

That's just me going from memory rather than reading the detailed
descriptions.

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
Is there a list of such regressions?

Doing a search for bugs specifically against 6.0.24 and then looking for 
those labeled as regressions shows one bug: 48701 
<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701>.

48616 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616> is 
labeled as a blocker rather than a regression, but is apparently also a 
regression.

Any other regressions to be aware of when considering 6.0.24?

--
Jess Holle

On 2/16/2010 5:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>
> Also, if folks have a little time, there are a reasonable number of
> proposals in the STATUS file for review. While some are quite involved,
> a number are quite simple and should be quick to review.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>    


Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by Ashish Jain <as...@gmail.com>.
Please include 48685 "Spnego Support in Tomcat" in tomcat 6.0.25.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:13 PM, jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on
> aiming
> >>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
> >>> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
> >>>
> >>
> >> +1 on my side :-)
> >
> > Great. When works for you (keeping in mind there are a lot of patches
> > that folks need time to review). Early next week?
>
> Yep
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
>>> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>>>
>>
>> +1 on my side :-)
> 
> Great. When works for you (keeping in mind there are a lot of patches
> that folks need time to review). Early next week?

Yep

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
>> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>>
> 
> +1 on my side :-)

Great. When works for you (keeping in mind there are a lot of patches
that folks need time to review). Early next week?

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:03 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:

> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
>> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>> 
> 
> +1 on my side :-)
> 

Same here.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
> 

+1 on my side :-)

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org