You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by radha_mit <Ra...@ivycomptech.com> on 2010/07/16 12:36:42 UTC

ActiveMQ persistence store option


We are in dilemma in which persistence option to use for activeMQ.
we tested both local disk and NFs version 4 .
The NFSv4 was very slow when compared to the speed of local disk.
But we will be more comfortable with a master-slave topology.

Can any one suggest what else can we think so ?
Can lustre be a better option ?


Thanks,
Radha
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-persistence-store-option-tp29182264p29182264.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.